Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 14;88(1):18–23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1255482

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the dual-mobility and unipolar cup THAsa

Dual-mobility (n = 150) Unipolar (n = 166) Mean/Risk differenceb(95% CI) p-value
Mean age (SD) 73 (11.1) 65 (15.2) −7.9 (−11 to −4.9) < 0.001
Mean BMI (SD) 26 (5.8) 26 (5.2) −0.2 (−1.4 to 1.0) 0.8
Mean operating time (SD), min 152 (60) 185 (69) 33 (19 to 48) < 0.001
Women (%) 84 (56) 76 (46) 10 (−0.7 to 21) 0.07
BMI ≥30 (%) 38 (25) 39 (24) 1.8 (−7.7 to 11) 0.7
Smoking statusc(%)
 Ever-smoker 58 (46) 59 (52) −6.5 (−19 to 6.1) 0.3
 Never-smoker 69 (54) 54 (48)
ASA score (%)
 1–2 96 (64) 116 (70) −5.9 (−16 to 4.5) 0.3
 3–4 54 (36) 50 (30)
Diabetes (%) 26 (17) 19 (11) 5.9 (−1.9 to 14) 0.1
Previous THA revision (%) 38 (25) 36 (22) 6.7 (−5.7 to 13) 0.4
Surgical approach (%)
 With osteotomy 33 (22) 48 (29) −6.9 (−17 to 2.7) 0.2
 Without osteotomy 117 (78) 118 (71)
  Posterior 68 (46) 43 (26)
  Anterior Hueter 15 (10) 14 (8.4)
  Antero-lateral 34 (23) 61 (37)
Indication for revision (%)
 Aseptic loosening 51 (34) 76 (46) −12 (−23 to −1.1) 0.03
 Dislocation 41 (27) 17 (10) 17 (8.6 to 26) < 0.001
 Infection 22 (15) 26 (16) −1.0 (−8.9 to 6.9) 0.8
 Pain/impingement 4 (2.7) 19 (11) −8.8 (−14 to −3.3) 0.003
 Polyethylene wear 5 (3.3) 5 (3.0) 0.3 (−3.6 to 4.2) 0.9
 Adverse local tissue reaction 7 (4.7) 7 (4.2) 0.5 (−4.1 to 5) 0.9
 Periprosthetic fracture 17 (11) 11 (6.6) 4.7 (−1.6 to 11) 0.1
 Other 3 (2.0) 5 (3.0) −1.0 (−4.4 to 2.4) 0.6
Head size (%)
 ≤ 32 mm 150 (100) 114 (69) 31 (24 to 38) < 0.001
 > 32 mm 52 (31.3)
Acetabular reinforce-ment ring (%) 53 (35) 77 (46) −11 (−22 to −0.3) 0.05
a

Percentages calculated on total no. of patients with information available.

b

Age, BMI, and operating time is Mean difference, the rest is Risk difference

c

Information on smoking status missing for 23 patients in group 1 and for 53 patients in group 2.