TABLE 3.

Tree statistics and summary sequence

No. of taxa	Data set	No. of:				Tree length (steps)	CI	RI	P (WS-R)c
		Characters	PICa	Autb	MPTs
109	EF-1α	651	44	9	4	56	1.0	1.0
109	IGS rDNA	2,510	144	107	63	312	0.84	0.96
109	EF-1α + IGS rDNA (Fig. 1B)	3,161	188	116	16	384	0.83	0.96	1.0
80	EF-1α	651	6	6	2	12	1.0	1.0
80	IGS rDNA	2,506	61	54	2	118	0.99	0.99
80	mtSSU rDNA	677	4	1	1	5	1.0	1.0
80	EF-1α + IGS rDNA	3,157	67	60	4	132	0.98	0.98	1.0
80	EF-1α + mtSSU rDNA	1,328	10	7	2	17	1.0	1.0	1.0
80	IGS rDNA + mtSSU rDNA	3,183	65	55	2	127	0.96	0.97	1.0
80	EF-1α + IGS + mtSSU (Fig. 2A)	3,834	71	61	4	141	0.95	0.96	1.0
80	AFLP D	87	37	23	>100	68	0.88	0.93
80	AFLP E	86	29	18	>100	57	0.82	0.86
80	AFLP D + E (Fig. 2B)	173	66	41	>64,000	128	0.84	0.88	1.0
	MAT1-1 idiomorph (Fig. 3B)	4,017	32	9	1	41	1.0	1.0
41	mtSSU rDNA	694	16	19	>100	46	0.91	0.95
41	EF-1α	655	42	31	9	84	0.93	0.96
41	mtSSU rDNA + EF-1α (Fig. 4)	1,349	58	50	18	134	0.90	0.94	1.0

^aPIC, parsimony informative characters (i.e., synapomorphies).

^bAut, autapomorphies.

^cProbability, using the W-SR test, of getting a more extreme T value, with the null hypothesis being no difference between the two trees.