Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov;42(11):5337–5340. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5337-5340.2004

TABLE 1.

Categorization of CECR-KP isolates according to the results of phenotypic detection methods for AmpC, ESBLs, and MBLs

Isolate group No. of isolates Three-dimensional test result for AmpC detectiona Double-disk test result for ESBL detection Double-disk test result for MBL detection NCCLS confirmatory test result for ESBLs
Zone diameter change on CAZ (mm)b Zone diameter change on CTX (mm)b No. (%) of test-positive isolates
1a 30 Positive Negative Negative +1 to +4 0 to +1 0 (0)
1b 12 Positive Negative Negative −4 to −8 0 to −5 0 (0)
2a 10 Positive Positive Negative −2 to −4 +8 to +14 9 (100)
2b 6 Positive Positive Negative +1 to +3 +12 to +14 5 (100)
2c 19 Positive Positive Negative +1 to +5 +2 to +6 9 (47.4)
3 2 Positive Negative Positive +4, +6 +2, +4 1 (50.0)
4 9 Negative or indeterminate Positive Negative +6 to +17 +7 to +14 9 (100)
5 11 Negative or indeterminate Negative Negative +1 to +3 +1 to +3 11 (0)
a

The results were interpreted and grouped as described by Manchanda and Singh (7).

b

Changes in zone diameters of disks of ceftazidime (CAZ) and cefotaxime (CTX) plus clavulanic acid in comparison with those of drug disks-without clavulanic acid.