Table 1.
d | θ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0.01 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
0.01 | – | – | (100/0.7) | (100/0.5) |
0.1 | – | – | – | (100/4.0) |
0.2 | – | – | – | – |
0.5 | (0.0/0.0) | – | – | – |
1.0 | (0.0/1.0) | (0.0/1.0) | – | – |
Data sets where PAML could not detect the presence of positive selection using the LRT are shown by a “–”. The percentage of sites undergoing positive selection that were identified, as well as the percentage of other sites that were misidentified, is shown for data sets for which the LRT indicated positive selection