Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e013346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013346

Trends and changes in paediatric tonsil surgery in Sweden 1987–2013: a population-based cohort study

Anna Borgström 1,2, Pia Nerfeldt 1,2, Danielle Friberg 1,2, Ola Sunnergren 3, Joacim Stalfors 4
PMCID: PMC5253564  PMID: 28087550

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to longitudinally describe the history of tonsil surgery in Swedish children and adolescents regarding incidence, indications for surgery, surgical methods and the age and gender distributions.

Setting

A retrospective longitudinal population-based cohort study based on register data from the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) and population data from Statistics Sweden.

Participants

All Swedish children 1–<18 years registered in the NPR with a tonsil surgery procedure 1987–2013.

Results

167 894 tonsil surgeries were registered in the NPR 1987–2013. An increase in the total incidence rate was observed, from 22/10 000 person years in 1987 to 47/10 000 in 2013. The most marked increase was noted in children 1–3 years of age, increasing from 17 to 73/10 000 person years over the period. The proportion children with obstructive/sleep disordered breathing (SDB) indications increased from 42.4% in 1987 to 73.6% in 2013. Partial tonsillectomy, tonsillotomy (TT), increased since 1996 and in 2013 55.1% of all tonsil procedures were TTs.

Conclusions

There have been considerable changes in clinical practice for tonsil surgery in Swedish children over the past few decades. Overall, a doubling in the total incidence rate was observed. This increase consisted mainly of an increase in surgical procedures due to obstructive/SDB indications, particularly among the youngest age group (1–3 years old). TT has gradually replaced tonsillectomy as the predominant method for tonsil surgery.

Keywords: tonsillectomy, tonsillotomy, tonsil surgery, register


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • This study describes the epidemiological trends of tonsil surgery in Swedish children over the past few decades.

  • The major strengths of the study are the large population size and the use of the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) with unique nationwide data and high coverage.

  • The study covers a long period of time and can therefore be used to determine actual longitudinal application of clinical practice concerning tonsil surgery in Sweden.

  • One limitation is the potential inherent weakness of the NPR with the possibilities of missing values and inaccurate data reporting.

  • Data are limited to a Swedish population and the generalisability from a global perspective might be somewhat limited, but the results can possibly indicate the evolutionary factors affecting tonsil surgery on a more global scale.

Introduction

Tonsil surgery has an ancient history and was first described in the literature almost 3000 years ago.1 Today, tonsillectomy (TE), with or without adenoidectomy, is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in children, with over 530 000 TEs performed on children in the USA each year2 and nearly 9000 tonsil procedures performed on children in Sweden in 2013.3

Over the past 100 years, tonsil surgery has undergone a number of changes, particularly with respect to indications and surgical methods. Prior to 1900, the predominant surgical technique was tonsillotomy (TT) with subtotal intracapsular removal of the tonsils.4 Then, along with advances in anaesthesiology at the beginning of the twentieth century, total extracapsular TE gradually became more common. This paradigm shift from TT to TE was essentially complete by 19504 and during the second half of the twentieth century, TE was the prevailing method. Later, in the 1990s, the previously abandoned method of TT was revived in some countries, including Sweden and Austria.5 Compared with TE, TT is associated with fewer perioperative morbidities, such as postoperative haemorrhage and pain,6 7 and it is now primarily used to treat sleep disordered breathing (SDB) caused by upper airway obstruction due to tonsil hypertrophy.8

Along with shifts in surgical methods, the indications for tonsil surgery have also changed considerably. At the beginning of the twentieth century, in the preantibiotic era, infection or recurrent tonsillitis was the main indication for tonsil surgery.9 Following the introduction of antibiotics in the 1950s, the number of TEs decreased dramatically over the following decades.10 11 Then, in the 1970s the first cases of paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) were identified12 and a successive shift in indications followed. Today, upper airway obstruction/SDB is the most common indication for tonsil surgery in children, having surpassed the second largest indication group, infections related tonsil disease.9

A more detailed analysis of the trends and changes in paediatric tonsil surgery during the twentieth century is difficult to perform due to lack of high-quality data sources.

The National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden has initiated a national registry, known as the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR), with the aim of collecting data on all healthcare procedures performed in Sweden.13 The NPR provides the possibility of performing detailed analyses of trends and changes in healthcare practices in a nationwide population. Indeed, this database provides a unique source of data with few, if any, equals around the world.

The importance of monitoring historical and current trends in medical practice cannot be overstated. Some of the most important changes in indications and methods for paediatric tonsil surgery over the last century were not the result of evidence-based research; rather they were based on local praxis and traditions. Furthermore, the related consequences of these changes regarding outcome, complications and economic costs are often unstudied.

The objective of this study was to longitudinally describe the history of tonsil surgery in Swedish children and adolescents with respect to incidence, indications for surgery and surgical methods, as well as age and gender distributions. A description of the trends in paediatric tonsil surgery is a prerequisite to identifying critical research areas that will allow us to determine best practices and improve healthcare quality and can also be a guide to future public health planning.

Materials and methods

Study design

A retrospective longitudinal population-based cohort study based on register data from the NPR and population data from Statistics Sweden.

Data sources

Swedish National Patient Register

All medical data were collected from the NPR. Registration in the NPR is mandatory by law for public and private care providers (except primary care) in Sweden. The NPR contains information regarding medical data (diagnoses, surgical procedures), patient-related data (gender, age, personal identity number) and information regarding healthcare providers. The NPR is thought to have complete national coverage for inpatient care starting in 198714; outpatient care was included beginning in 1997 and was mandatory starting in 2001.

Statistics Sweden

A government agency that coordinates the official statistics of Sweden and provides statistical information on the Swedish population.15

Study population

The study population included all patients 1–<18 years registered in the NPR with a tonsil surgery procedure between 1 January 1987 and 31 December 2013. The search was based on surgical codes in the Nordic Medico-Statistical Committees Classification of Surgical Procedures, including TE and TT with or without simultaneous adenoidectomy.

Diagnosis codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) were collected from the NPR. Since 1987, two different ICD classifications have been used (ICD-9 1987–1996 and ICD-10 1997–). For patients registered from 1997 (ICD-10) onward, it was possible to exclude patients with malignant disease (C- or D 0–48 codes).

Population statistics for all individuals in Sweden aged 1–<18 years during the study period were collected from the Sweden Statistics population database.

Indications for surgery were categorised in two main groups: ‘obstructive/SDB’ and ‘infectious’ (table 1); all other indications were referred to as ‘other’. The indication groups were analysed with respect to age, gender and longitudinal incidence.

Table 1.

Patients were categorised into ‘obstructive/SDB’ and ‘infectious’ groups based on the diagnoses from the ICD-9 and ICD-10 classification

Obstructive/SDB Infectious
ICD-9 (1987–1996) ICD-9 (1987–1996)
307E Specific Sleep Disturbances
474B Hypertrophy of adenoids and tonsils
474C Adenoid vegetations
519W Other specified diseases of the respiratory system not elsewhere classified
780F Sleep disturbances
786A Dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities
786B Stridor
519W Other specified diseases of the respiratory system not elsewhere classified
101X Vincent′s angina
469X Acute nasopharyngitis
462X Acute pharyngitis
463X Acute tonsillitis
465A Acute laryngopharyngitis
465X Acute upper respiratory infection of
unspecified site
472 Chronic pharyngitis and nasopharyngitis
472B Chronic pharyngitis
472C Chronic nasopharyngitis
474A Chronic tonsillitis
475X Peritonsillar abscess
682B Cellulitis/abscess, neck
101X Vincent′s angina
ICD-10 (1997–) ICD-10 (1997–)
G47.0 Insomnia
G47.2 Disorders of the sleep-wake schedule
G47.3 Sleep apnoea
G47.30 Sleep apnoea, unspecified
G47.39 Sleep apnoea, other
G47.8 Other sleep disorders
G47.9 Sleep disorder, unspecified
J35.1 Hypertrophy of tonsils
J35.2 Hypertrophy of adenoids
J35.3 Hypertrophy of tonsils with hypertrophy of adenoids
R06.1 Stridor
R06.3 Periodic breathing
R06.5 Mouth breathing
R06.50 Mouth breathing and snoring
R06.8 Other and unspecified abnormalities of breathing
A42.2 Cervicofacial actinomycosis
A42.8 Other forms of actinomycosis
A42.9 Actinomycosis, unspecified
A69.1 Other Vincent infections
B27.0 Mononucleosis due to Epstein-Barr virus
B27.1 Cytomegaloviral mononucleosis
B27.8 Other infectious mononucleosis
B27.9 Infectious mononucleosis, unspecified
J00.9 Acute nasopharyngitis
J02.0 Streptococcal pharyngitis
J02- Acute pharyngitis
J02.9 Acute pharyngitis, unspecified
J03.0 Streptococcal tonsillitis
J03.8 Acute tonsillitis due to other specified organisms
J03.9 Acute tonsillitis, unspecified
J06.9 Acute upper respiratory infection, unspecified
J31.1 Chronic nasopharyngitis
J31.2 Chronic pharyngitis
J35.0 Chronic tonsillitis
J35.00 Chronic tonsillitis
J35.09 Chronic tonsillitis

ICD, International Classification of Diseases; SDB, sleep disordered breathing.

Statistical analysis

Mainly descriptive statistics were used. The denominator used for incidence rate calculations was the sum of the end-of-year population estimates for each year and age.

For comparison of the event rate between boys and girls, assuming that the events are Poisson distributed, an exact binomial test was performed.

Gender differences regarding indication for surgery in specific age groups were tested using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

Incidence rate trends were tested by using joinpoint regression models (Joinpoint Regression program, V.4.3.1.0, April 2016; Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute) that identified points (joinpoints) where linear trends of tonsil surgery changed significantly in direction or magnitude. The rate of change for each trend was tested to determine whether the change was significantly different from zero. In the final model, each trend is described by an annual percentage change (APC) with a 95% CI. The joinpoint analyses were performed for boys and girls separately.

All significance tests were two-sided and conducted at the 5% significance level. All analyses except the Joinpoint regression were performed with SAS System V.9 (SAS Inst., Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Results

In total, 167 894 tonsil surgeries (82 398 (49%) girls and 85 496 (51%) boys) were registered in the NPR between 1987 and 2013 (table 2).

Table 2.

The number and incidence rate of tonsil surgery procedures registered in the NPR between 1987 and 2013 by age, gender (F=females, M=males) and time period

1987–1990
1991–1994
1995–1998
1999–2002
2003–2006
2007–2010
2011–2013
1987–2013
Age group n Rate n Rate n Rate n Rate n Rate n Rate n Rate n
F1–3 1003 16 2236 31 2073 33 1475 28 1834 32 2660 42 2838 56
F 4–6 2054 36 3938 60 4443 62 2801 47 2959 54 3881 64 3800 78
F 7–9 1375 24 1937 33 2341 34 1671 24 1353 24 1700 30 1568 33
F 10–12 1146 20 1448 25 1497 24 1208 17 1153 17 1108 19 1032 23
F 13–15 1682 27 1702 29 1639 28 1543 24 1771 24 1876 28 1090 25
F 16–17 1687 38 1621 40 1481 38 1535 38 2153 46 2592 52 1494 47
F subtotal 8947 26 12 882 37 13 474 37 10 233 28 11 223 31 13 817 39 11 822 45 82 398
M 1–3 1677 26 3509 47 3235 49 2416 43 2861 47 4140 62 4370 82
M 4–6 2934 49 5278 76 5979 79 3793 61 4017 70 5549 87 5051 97
M 7–9 1503 25 2117 34 2447 34 1724 23 1496 25 1808 30 1693 34
M 10–12 790 13 1081 18 1008 15 847 11 851 12 863 14 805 17
M 13–15 746 11 898 15 866 14 730 11 805 10 1006 15 630 14
M 16–17 766 17 769 18 672 16 768 18 1038 21 1235 24 725 21
M subtotal 8416 24 13 652 37 14 207 37 10 278 27 11 068 29 14 601 39 13 274 47 85 496
Total 17 363 25 26 534 37 27 681 37 20 511 28 22 291 30 28 418 39 25 096 46 167 894
p Value 0.0011

Total numbers, total rates and significant difference in bold type.

The rate was calculated as the incidence/10 000 person years. The p value for the gender difference is shown.

NPR, National Patient Register.

Incidence

The overall incidence rate of registered tonsil operations in patients aged 1–<18 years increased from 22/10 000 person years in 1987 to 47/10 000 person years in 2013 (figure 1). This increase was continuous over the study period, with the exception from 1996 to 2001, when a decrease was observed (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The incidence and indications of tonsil surgery in children aged 1–<18 years from 1987 to 2013. Incidence/100 000 person years.

The most marked increase in incidence was noted in children aged 1–3 years, increasing from 17/10 000 person years in 1987 to 73/10 000 person years in 2013. This 1–3-year-old group increased their share of total tonsil surgeries from 13.5% 1987 to 29.4% in 2013. The trends in incidence rates for boys and girls are shown in figure 2A, B. Trends were similar and significant for both genders (table 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A and B) Joinpoint regression analyses showing the trends in the incidence rate of tonsil surgery for boys (A) and girls (B) 1987–2013. For both genders, two joinpoints were observed (1994 and 2001 for boys, 1995 and 2001 for girls). The crude rate is the incidence rate/100 000 person years. APC, annual percentage change.

Table 3.

Summary of joinpoint APC for tonsil surgery incidence in boys (A) and girls (B) 1987–2013

Lower end point Upper end point APC Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI p Value
(A) Boys
 1987 1994 12.0 9.3 14.8 <0.001
 1994 2001 −7.7 −10.2 −5.1 <0.001
 2001 2013 6.0 5.0 6.9 <0.001
(B) Girls
 1987 1995 7.1 5.3 8.9 <0.001
 1995 2001 −7.2 −10.2 −4.2 <0.001
 2001 2013 4.9 4.0 5.8 >0.001

Significant trends in bold type.

The APC is significant different from zero at α=0.05. CI.

APC, annual percentage change.

Gender and age

For the total time period, the incidence difference between the genders were significant (p=0.0011, exact binomial test), showing a dominance of boys (table 2).

Figure 3A, B shows the age and gender distributions as well as the indication groups. For both genders, the indication ‘obstructive/SDB’ was most common in the younger age groups, with a peak between ages 2 and 6, and the highest incidence (113/10 000 person years) was in 3-year-old boys with obstruction between 2008 and 2013 (figure 3A, B). Infectious indications were more common in teenagers for both genders, particularly for girls, whose incidence was three to four times greater compared with boys of the same age.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A and B) Incidence of tonsil surgery procedures for boys (A) and girls (B) aged 1–<18 years between 1987 and 2013 separated by age and indication. Black lines represent obstructive indications and grey lines represent infectious. Each curve represents a 6-year or 7-year period.

The gender differences were significant in the age group 2–6-year-olds who were operated for obstructive/SDB indications with a male dominance (p<0.001) as well as in the age group 14–17-year-olds operated for infection with a female dominance (p<0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test).

Further, figure 3A, B shows that the highest incidence levels for tonsil surgery for boys and girls at all ages were observed over the previous time period, 2008–2013. The major reason for this increase was operations in young children with obstruction.

Indications

The indications for surgery between 1987 and 2013 are presented as proportions of the total incidence in figure 1. The incidence of tonsil procedures performed for the indication obstructive/SDB increased nearly fourfold over this period, from 10 to 36/10 000 person years (figure 1). Since 1990, obstruction/SDB constituted the major indication group. In 1987, 42.4% of tonsil procedures were performed for obstructive/SDB, whereas in 2013, this proportion was 73.6%. In the youngest age groups (children 1–<4 years old), the vast majority (>90%) of tonsil procedures were performed for obstructive/SDB indications. The incidence of infectious tonsil disease as an indication remained stable over the study period.

Surgical methods

Figure 4 shows the proportions of TE and TT (± adenoidectomy) between 1987 and 2013. An increase in the number of TT procedures began in 1996 with a gradual annual increasing trend, followed by a sharp increase from 2006 onward. From 1997 to 2005, TT increased from 1.8% to 9.8% of all tonsil procedures, and from 2006 to 2013 it increased from 11.2% to 55.1% of all procedures. From 2011 onwards, TT was more common than TE. The major indication for TT was obstruction, and in 2013 >96% of all TTs were performed for this indication. When TE was used, about half (49%) of the procedures were performed due to infection in 2013, a percentage that was generally stable during the observed period.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Distributions of the percentage of TE and TT procedures, with or without simultaneous adenoidectomy, performed between 1987 and 2013. The proportion due to an obstructive/SDB indication is shadowed for each method. TE, tonsillectomy. TT, tonsillectomy.

In the youngest group (1–3-year-olds), TT was most common, and in 2013, 71% of all tonsil surgeries in this age group were TTs.

Discussion

This study was based on a national cohort and describes the epidemiological trends during 1987–2013 for tonsil surgeries in Swedish children. Overall, the incidence rate for paediatric tonsil surgery has roughly doubled during the observation period due to an increase in the number of procedures performed for the obstruction/SDB indication. Furthermore, TT has gradually replaced TE as the predominant surgical method. Few previous studies have addressed these topics in large national cohorts over long periods of time.

Incidence

During the study period, 1987–2013, there was a near doubling of the incidence rate for tonsil operations in Swedish children, with incidence rates reaching 47/10 000 person years in 2013. A similar, albeit weaker, trend was reported in a Danish study based on a national cohort, where the cumulative risk of TE in the first 20 years of life increased nearly 20% between 1980 and 2001.16

Another important observation in the present study was that the incidence for the youngest group of children, 1–3 years of age, increased more than fourfold over the study period. This trend was also seen in a study from the UK in which TE rates among children <4 years of age increased from 13.5 to 21.3/10 000 children during the period from 2001 to 2012.17

The Swedish incidence rate can be viewed as relatively low compared with other nations. Van den Akker et al reported large differences in TE rates between several European countries, the US, Canada and Australia. Incidence rates varied from 19/10 000 person years in Canada to 118/10 000 in Northern Ireland.18 The incidence rates in our study varied from 22/10 000 person years in 1987 to 47/10 000 in 2013. Potential explanations to this variation in incidence rates between different countries include differences in national guidelines for tonsil surgery, differences in the availability of medical service and differences in reimbursement systems.

For instance, in the Netherlands, antibiotics are not recommended for uncomplicated tonsillitis, which could be a reason for the relatively higher incidence of TE in that country.19 In contrast, in the NHS system of the UK, the incidence rate has decreased after evidence regarding outcomes following tonsil surgery for infectious indications were questioned. Concomitant with this decrease in TE rates, there was an increase in admissions and serious complications due to tonsil infections.20

Interestingly, local geographic and sociodemographic factors have been reported to influence tonsil surgery incidence rates.17 21 A recent Swedish study reported an increased risk of paediatric SDB in families with low socioeconomic status,22 and this has also been suggested to be a risk factor for group A streptococcal infections.23

Age and gender

We observed a peak in incidence rates during the preschool years, the same age that the prevalence of SDB/OSA peaks.24 This peak was significantly higher for boys than it was for girls, which is likely because childhood SDB is more common in boys.25 Another peak occurred in teenage girls with primarily infectious indications. This significant difference in gender distributions among teenagers could indicate that infectious tonsil diseases are more prevalent in females, although the reasons for this are not fully understood. Overall the observed age and gender distributions were well in line with previous publications showing similar results.21 26

Indications

Overall, a shift in the prevalence of indications was observed, with obstructive/SDB indications increasing over the study period. Obstruction/SDB now constitutes the primary indication for tonsil surgery in children, which is consistent with other published studies.27 28 The incidence for infectious indications remained relatively stable over the study period.

The most common indication in the younger age group by far was obstruction/SDB, which was seen in this study as well as in several previous studies,10 28 likely reflecting an increased awareness of upper airway obstruction and SDB as a common disease in the paediatric population. In a single county study from Minnesota, a comparable large-scale shift in indications was observed with an increase in the percentage of SDB/obstructive indications from 12% in 1970 to 77% in 2005.26 Bhattacharyya and Lin29 reported that the rates of paediatric adenotonsillectomy nearly doubled between 1996 and 2006, likely due to increased recognition of SDB and OSA. An increasing use of polysomnography (PSG) could have supported this theory of increased awareness of obstructive/SDB indications, but no such data were available in our database for this cohort. Overall, PSG is very sparsely used in children in Sweden.

Another possible explanation to the increase in obstructive/SDB indications could be increasing prevalence of obesity. However, studies of obesity among Swedish children have observed an increase from 1984 to 2000, but thereafter a stabilisation of the prevalence.30–32 In our database, no information about obesity was available and therefore this could not be further analysed.

Surgical methods

Along with a shift in indications, there has also been a shift in surgical methods, with TT gradually replacing TE as the most common surgical method for children in Sweden. This was also the conclusion of a study based on data from another Swedish registry independent of the NPR, the National Tonsil Register in Sweden.33 Since 2011, TT has become more common than TE in Sweden. That same year, new national guidelines for TT were issued in Sweden.34 One possible explanation for our findings could be that Swedish ENT surgeons consider TT to be safe enough to perform on small children. TT has advantages over TE with respect to postoperative complications such as pain and bleeding6 35 with comparable outcomes for symptom relief.36 A known disadvantage of TT is the regrowth of tonsils with recurrence of obstructive/SDB symptoms and need for reoperation. A recent Swedish study based on the NPR found a seven times higher risk for reoperation after TT than after TE, with the highest risk in the youngest age groups.37

However, the clinical practice of TT for treating airway obstructions in children seem to be spreading; for instance, in Austria, several serious complications with post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage has led to a switch to TT.5

Strengths and limitations

In this study, there was a marked decrease in the incidence rate of tonsil surgeries between 1996 and 2001. The reasons for this decrease in the number of recorded surgeries were analysed together with the representatives from the NPR (Personal communication with Quality Manager for the Patient Register, Anders Jacobsson). One reason for this dip could be a failure on the part of the NPR to collect data on performed surgeries, perhaps due to the increased use of day-care surgery between 1997 and 2001. Another reason could be insufficient reporting to the NPR from private hospitals, which became more numerous during this period. However, we believe this decrease was too great to be explained by failed registrations alone and must represent an actual decrease in the number of surgeries, although the true extent of this decrease cannot be precisely determined.

The NPR is generally considered to have high coverage,14 although like all clinical registers, it has potential inherent limitations, including inaccurate data reporting and missing values.

Major strengths include the large population size of the register and its wealth of unique nationwide data over a long time period. It can therefore be used to determine actual longitudinal application of a clinical practice in a specific country over long periods of time.

Conclusions

Our results showed considerable changes in clinical practices for tonsil surgery in Sweden during the period 1987 to 2013. Overall, a doubling in the incidence rates was observed during this period. The reason for this change was an increase in surgical procedures due to upper airway obstruction/SDB, particularly among the youngest age group (1–3 years old) and among boys. Further, TT has gradually replaced TE as the predominant surgical method for obstructive/SDB indications. The incidence rates for infectious indications for tonsil surgery have remained relatively stable during the study period, and the most common patients in the infectious group were teenage girls.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Henrik Passmark at the National Board of Health and Welfare for compiling the data from the NPR and statisticians Bengt Bengtsson and Nils-Gunnar Pehrsson from Statistiska Konsultgruppen for statistical analysis.

Footnotes

Contributors: AB and JS contributed to the study design. AB, PN, DF, OS and JS contributed to the interpretation and analysis of data. AB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PN, DF, OS and JS contributed to the final writing and revising of the manuscript and checked for important intellectual content. All authors approved of the final manuscript as submitted.

Funding: This study was supported by financial grants from the Acta Otolaryngologica Foundation, the Freemason Child House Foundation in Stockholm and The Health and Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethics approval: This study was approved by the regional ethical review board of Gothenburg, Sweden (Dnr 534-14).

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.

References

  • 1.McNeill RA. A history of tonsillectomy: two millenia of trauma, haemorrhage and controversy. Ulster Med J 1960;29:59–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. National Health Statistics Report 2009;2:1–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson AL Jr et al. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hultcrantz E, Ericsson E. Factors influencing the indication for tonsillectomy: a historical overview and current concepts. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2013;75:184–91. 10.1159/000342322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarny S, Habermann W, Ossimitz G et al. What lessons can be learned from the Austrian events? ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2013;75:175–81. 10.1159/000342319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koltai PJ, Solares CA, Koempel JA et al. Intracapsular tonsillar reduction (partial tonsillectomy): reviving a historical procedure for obstructive sleep disordered breathing in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:532–8. 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00727-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hultcrantz E, Ericsson E. Pediatric tonsillotomy with the radiofrequency technique: less morbidity and pain. Laryngoscope 2004;114:871–7. 10.1097/00005537-200405000-00016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Windfuhr JP, Werner JA. Tonsillotomy: it's time to clarify the facts. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:2985–96. 10.1007/s00405-013-2577-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gysin C. Indications of pediatric tonsillectomy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2013;75:193–202. 10.1159/000342329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parker NP, Walner DL. Trends in the indications for pediatric tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:282–5. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rosenfeld RM, Green RP. Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy: changing trends. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99(Pt 1):187–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guilleminault C, Eldridge FL, Simmons FB et al. Sleep apnea in eight children. Pediatrics 1976;58:23–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register/halsodataregister/patientregistret/inenglish.
  • 14.Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011;11:450 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.http://www.scb.se/en_/ (in English)
  • 16.Vestergaard H, Wohlfahrt J, Westergaard T et al. Incidence of tonsillectomy in Denmark, 1980 to 2001. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007;26:1117–21. 10.1097/INF.0b013e31814536ba [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koshy E, Bottle A, Murray J et al. Changing indications and socio-demographic determinants of (adeno)tonsillectomy among children in England—are they linked? A retrospective analysis of hospital data. PLoS One 2014;9:e103600 10.1371/journal.pone.0103600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van Den Akker EH, Hoes AW, Burton MJ et al. Large international differences in (adeno)tonsillectomy rates. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:161–4. 10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00771.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Jongh E, Opstelten W, Werkgroep NHG-Standaard Acute keelpijn. Revision of the Dutch College of General Practitioners practice guideline ‘acute sore throat’. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015;159:A9456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lau AS, Upile NS, Wilkie MD et al. The rising rate of admissions for tonsillitis and neck space abscesses in England, 1991–2011. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014;96:307–10. 10.1308/003588414X13946184900363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boss EF, Marsteller JA, Simon AE. Outpatient tonsillectomy in children: demographic and geographic variation in the United States, 2006. J Pediatr 2012;160:814–19. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.11.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Friberg D, Lundkvist K, Li X et al. Parental poverty and occupation as risk factors for pediatric sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Med 2015;16:1169–75. 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Factor SH, Levine OS, Harrison LH et al. Risk factors for pediatric invasive group A streptococcal disease. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:1062–6. 10.3201/eid1107.040900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ward SL, Marcus CL. Obstructive sleep apnea in infants and young children. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996;13:198–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lumeng JC, Chervin RD. Epidemiology of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:242–52. 10.1513/pats.200708-135MG [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Erickson BK, Larson DR, St Sauver JL et al. Changes in incidence and indications of tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy, 1970–2005. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:894–901. 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mitchell RB, Pereira KD, Friedman NR. Sleep-disordered breathing in children: survey of current practice. Laryngoscope 2006;116:956–8. 10.1097/01.MLG.0000216413.22408.FD [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Patel HH, Straight CE, Lehman EB et al. Indications for tonsillectomy: a 10 year retrospective review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:2151–5. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.09.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bhattacharyya N, Lin HW. Changes and consistencies in the epidemiology of pediatric adenotonsillar surgery, 1996–2006. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;143:680–4. 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mårild S, Bondestam M, Bergström R et al. Prevalence trends of obesity and overweight among 10-year-old children in western Sweden and relationship with parental body mass index. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:1588–95. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb00848.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moraeus L, Lissner L, Sjöberg A. Stable prevalence of obesity in Swedish schoolchildren from 2008 to 2013 but widening socio-economic gap in girls. Acta Paediatr 2014;103:1277–84. 10.1111/apa.12785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Munter JS, Friedl A, Lind S et al. Stability in the prevalence of Swedish children who were overweight or obese in 2003 and 2011. Acta Paediatr 2016;105:1173–80. 10.1111/apa.13351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hultcrantz E, Ericsson E, Hemlin C et al. Paradigm shift in Sweden from tonsillectomy to tonsillotomy for children with upper airway obstructive symptoms due to tonsillar hypertrophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:2531–6. 10.1007/s00405-013-2374-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hultcrantz E, Hemlin C, Eggertsen R et al. Indikation för tonsillotomi på barn och ungdomar 2011 (Swedish). http://www.skl.se/vi_arbetar_med//halsaochvard/kvalitetsutveckling/medicinska-indikationer (accessed Jun 2012).
  • 35.Acevedo JL, Shah RK, Brietzke SE. Systematic review of complications of tonsillotomy versus tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:871–9. 10.1177/0194599812439017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ericsson E, Lundeborg I, Hultcrantz E. Child behavior and quality of life before and after tonsillotomy versus tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1254–62. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Odhagen E, Sunnergren O, Hemlin C et al. Risk of reoperation after tonsillotomy versus tonsillectomy: a population-based cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3263–8. 10.1007/s00405-015-3871-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES