Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e012816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012816

Table 3.

Impact of professional parameters on burnout

  Burnout Crude Model 1 Model 2
Total N Per cent OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Management position
 Low 927 91 9.8 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Intermediate 278 39 13.5 2.8 (1.0 to 2.1)* 2.2 (0.8 to 1.8) 2.2 (0.8 to 1.8)
 High 81 2 2.5  
Job strain
 Low strain 240 16 6.6 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 High strain 303 37 13.9 1.9 (1.1 to 3.6)* 1.8 (1.1 to 3.1)* 1.1 (0.6 to 2.1)
 Active job 277 30 10.8 1.7 (0.9 to 3.2) 1.2 (0.7 to 1.9) 1.1 (0.5 to 1.1)
 Passive Job 480 48 10.0 1.6 (0.8 to 2.8) 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1) 1.1 (0.4 to 2.1)
Social support
 High (score >23) 940 79 8.4 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Low (score <23) 360 53 14.7 2.8 (1.9 to 4.1)* 1.2 (0.9 to 2.1) 1.1 (0.8 to 2.0)
Job satisfaction
 High (score ≥5) 1210 55 4.5 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Low (score <5) 90 77 85.6 124 (65 to 237)** 108 (48 to 215)** 108 (48 to 215)**

Model 1, OR adjusted for sociodemographic parameters (age, weight, sex, BMI, physical activity, smoking and alcohol habits). Model 2, OR adjusted for sociodemographic, professional (management position) and sleep parameters (habitual sleep time, weekend sleep time, ESS).

*p<0.05, **p<0.01, **p<0.001.

N, occurrence; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference.

BMI, body mass index; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale.