Table 3.
Association Between Cytochrome P-450 2D6 (CYP2D6) Genotype and Tamoxifen Efficacy Before and After Quantitative Bias Analyses
Before Quantitative Bias Analysis | Quantitative Bias Analysis Based on 3 Concordance Studies (33, 39, 43) | Quantitative Bias Analysis Based on the Goetz et al. (33) Study Only | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Point Estimate | 95% CI | P for Homogeneity | Point Estimate | 95% SI | Relative Bias, % | Point Estimate | 95% SI | Relative Bias, % | |
All studies (n = 21) | 1.71 | 1.24, 2.36 | <0.001 | 1.80 | 1.28, 2.54 | −5.4 | 1.82 | 1.28, 2.60 | −6.8 |
Studies using nonneoplastic tissue DNA (n = 16) | 2.19 | 1.42, 3.40 | <0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Studies using tumor-infiltrated tissue DNA (n = 5) | 1.09 | 0.78, 1.53 | 0.27 | 1.11 | 0.69, 1.80 | −1.8 | 1.10 | 0.65, 1.85 | −0.3 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; SI, simulation interval.