Table 4.

A summary of Full GR NS-NS merger calculations. EOS models include polytropes, piecewise polytropes (PP), as well as physically motivated models including cold SLy [83], FPS [222], and APR [3] models to which one adds an ideal-gas hot component to reflect shock heating, as well as the Shen [268, 267] finite temperature model and EOS that include Hyperonic contributions [264]. “Co/Ir” indicates that both corotating and irrotational models were considered; “BHB” indicates that BH binary mergers were also presented, including both BH-BH and BH-NS types, “ν-leak” indicates a neutrino leakage scheme was included in the calculation, “GH” indicates calculations were performed using the GHG formalism rather than BSSN, “non-QE” indicates superposition initial data were used, including cases where eccentric configurations were studied (“Eccen.”); “MHD” indicates MHD was used to evolve the system.

Group	Ref.	NS EOS	Mass ratio		notes
KT	[287]	Γ=2	1	0.09–0.15	Co/Ir
-	[288]	Γ = 2, 2.25	0.89–1	0.1–0.17
-	[285]	Γ=2	0.85–1	0.1–0.12
-	[286]	SLy, FPS+Hot	0.92–1	0.1–0.13
-	[282]	SLy, APR+Hot	0.64–1	0.11–0.13
-	[332]	Γ = 2	0.85–1	0.14–0.16	BHB
-	[144]	APR+Hot	0.8–1	0.14–0.18
-	[145]	APR, SLy, FPS+Hot	0.8–1.0	0.16–0.2
-	[265]	Shen	1	0.14–0.16	ν-leak
-	[134]	PP+hot	1	0.12–0.17
-	[264]	Shen, Hyp	1.0	0.14–0.16	ν-leak
HAD	[7]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.08	GH, non-QE
-	[6]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.08	GH, non-QE, MHD
Whisky	[17]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.14–0.18
-	[18]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.20
-	[116]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.14–0.18	MHD
-	[117]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.14–0.18	MHD
-	[240]	Γ=2	0.70–1.0	0.09–0.17
-	[14, 15]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.12–0.14
-	[241]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.18	MHD
UIUC	[172]	Γ = 2	0.85–1	0.14–0.18	MHD
Jena	[308, 41]	Γ = 2	1.0	0.14
-	[122]	Γ = 2	1.0	1.4	Eccen.