Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 3;114(3):522–527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614577114

Table S3.

Interregional comparisons of AHI and dAHI values from recensused forest plots (n = 115)

Region No. of plots SA CA WAN WAS GS EA Random No. of random points
Recensus plots: Interregional comparison of AHI values
 SA 47 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2,434
 CA 366 NA NA 0.695 0.627 NA 0.071 < 0.001 2,385
 WAN 216 NA 0.695 NA 0.999 NA 0.007 < 0.001 1,870
 WAS 166 NA 0.627 0.999 NA NA 0.003 < 0.001 1,395
 GS 60 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,229
 EA 27 NA 0.071 0.007 0.003 NA NA < 0.001 246
Recensus plots: Interregional comparison of dAHI values
 SA 47 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2,435
 CA 366 NA NA 0.073 < 0.001 NA 0.097 < 0.001 2,385
 WAN 216 NA 0.073 NA 0.264 NA < 0.001 < 0.001 1,870
 WAS 166 NA < 0.001 0.264 NA NA < 0.001 0.02 1,395
 GS 60 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,229
 EA 27 NA 0.097 < 0.001 < 0.001 NA NA < 0.001 246

Comparisons are P values from Nemenyi post hoc tests. Kruskal–Wallis tests indicated significant regional differences in both AHI values (χ2 = 13, df = 3, P = 0.004) and dAHI values (χ2 = 45, df = 3, P = < 0.001). CA, central; EA, eastern; GS, Guiana Shield; NA, not applicable; SA, southern; WAN, northwestern; WAS, southwestern. “Random” is the P value from the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test that compared the number of plots in each region with the distribution of random points.