Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 11;25(12):947–953. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004226

Table 2.

Regression results, operating room turnover times in minutes ±SD (n) during intervention

Type of room/procedure Raw mean
no feedback
Raw mean
feedback
Difference in logmean p Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI
All rooms 54.7±30.1 (863) 48.4±27.9 (1130) −0.104±0.065 0.1090 −0.231 0.023
All rooms scheduled 48.1±24.3 (611) 41.4±20.8 (795) −0.151±0.056 0.0041 −0.261 −0.041
All rooms Unscheduled 74.5±43 (252) 70.2±40.1 (335) −0.068±0.063 0.2818 −0.191 0.055
Fast rooms scheduled 46.8±22.5 (505) 37.2±16.2 (580) −0.206±0.058 0.0004 −0.320 −0.092
Slow rooms scheduled 69.3±37.2 (106) 65.8±38.0 (215) 0.017±0.118 0.887 −0.215 0.249

Inter-rater agreement: four auditors scored all checklist elements, (1) use of checklist, (2) team attentiveness, (3) required duration and (4) proper sequence with Fleiss’ kappas of 1, 95% CI (1.0 to 1.0) for 30 randomly selected cases. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for sign-in, time-out and sign-out ‘minimum time’ durations were 0.976, 95% CI (0.957 to 0.988), 0.953, 95% CI (0.917 to 0.976) and 0.999, 95% CI (0.998 to 0.999), respectively. ICCs for timed segment durations were 1.0, 95% CI (1.0 to 1.0) for all segments.