Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 12;18(3):670–677. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9882-5

Table I.

Comparison of Various Types of Equivalence Testing

Characteristics Bioequivalence (Generic drug products) Biosimilarity (biosimilar drug products)
In vitro BE testing In vivo BE testing Analytical PK/Clinical
Fundamental assumption Yesa Yesb No No
Log-data No Yes No No
Primary focus Mean Mean Mean Mean
Variability <10% 20–30% Vary 40–50%
Criterion (90, 111%) (80, 125%) EAC=± 1.5 * σ R SABE?c
Analysis Profile/non-profile Hypothesis/CI Hypothesis/CI Hypothesis/CI

aDrug release/delivery is predictive of drug absorption

bDrug absorption is predictive of clinical outcomes

cSABE is proposed criterion by the FDA for highly variable drug products (i.e., intra-subject CV is greater than 30%) Haidar et al. (11)