Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 14;311(6):R994–R1003. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00101.2016

Table 1.

Group average R2 values between AP predicted by models of the total baroreflex arc and measured AP

Linear Second-Order Uryson Third-Order Volterra Third-Order Uryson (Frequency-Domain) Third-Order Uryson (Laguerre Expansion)
WKY
    Training data 0.73 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.03* 0.90 ± 0.01*† 0.80 ± 0.03*† 0.80 ± 0.03*†
    Testing data 0.64 ± 0.03 0.71 ± 0.03* 0.69 ± 0.03*† 0.71 ± 0.03* 0.71 ± 0.03*
SHR120
    Training data 0.53 ± 0.05 0.69 ± 0.04* 0.88 ± 0.01*† 0.72 ± 0.05*† 0.71 ± 0.04*†
    Testing data 0.45 ± 0.03 0.64 ± 0.03* 0.64 ± 0.04* 0.65 ± 0.04* 0.66 ± 0.04*
SHR160
    Training data 0.63 ± 0.05 0.71 ± 0.05* 0.88 ± 0.03*† 0.72 ± 0.05* 0.72 ± 0.05*
    Testing data 0.59 ± 0.04 0.71 ± 0.03* 0.70 ± 0.03* 0.73 ± 0.03* 0.72 ± 0.03*

Values are means ± SE. Third-order Volterra model refers to Eq. 2. AP, arterial pressure; WKY, Wistar-Kyoto rats during Gaussian white noise carotid sinus pressure (CSP) stimulation with mean of 120 mmHg; SHR120 and SHR160, spontaneously hypertensive rats during the same CSP stimulation with mean of 120 and 160 mmHg, respectively. * and †Statistical significance for paired t-test comparison (after Holm’s correction for three comparisons) with corresponding linear model and second-order Uryson model, respectively.