Table 1.
Linear | Second-Order Uryson | Third-Order Volterra | Third-Order Uryson (Frequency-Domain) | Third-Order Uryson (Laguerre Expansion) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WKY | |||||
Training data | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.03* | 0.90 ± 0.01*† | 0.80 ± 0.03*† | 0.80 ± 0.03*† |
Testing data | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03* | 0.69 ± 0.03*† | 0.71 ± 0.03* | 0.71 ± 0.03* |
SHR120 | |||||
Training data | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.69 ± 0.04* | 0.88 ± 0.01*† | 0.72 ± 0.05*† | 0.71 ± 0.04*† |
Testing data | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.03* | 0.64 ± 0.04* | 0.65 ± 0.04* | 0.66 ± 0.04* |
SHR160 | |||||
Training data | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 0.71 ± 0.05* | 0.88 ± 0.03*† | 0.72 ± 0.05* | 0.72 ± 0.05* |
Testing data | 0.59 ± 0.04 | 0.71 ± 0.03* | 0.70 ± 0.03* | 0.73 ± 0.03* | 0.72 ± 0.03* |
Values are means ± SE. Third-order Volterra model refers to Eq. 2. AP, arterial pressure; WKY, Wistar-Kyoto rats during Gaussian white noise carotid sinus pressure (CSP) stimulation with mean of 120 mmHg; SHR120 and SHR160, spontaneously hypertensive rats during the same CSP stimulation with mean of 120 and 160 mmHg, respectively. * and †Statistical significance for paired t-test comparison (after Holm’s correction for three comparisons) with corresponding linear model and second-order Uryson model, respectively.