Table 3.
Concordance between FH from EMR data and self-reported FH
| CONDITION | FH FROM EMR DATA | SELF-REPORTED FH | Κ STATISTIC* (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| NO | YES | |||
| Diabetes (n = 775) | No | 459 | 41 | 0.466 (0.40–0.53) |
| Yes | 134 | 141 | ||
| Coronary artery disease (n = 775) | No | 433 | 175 | 0.225 (0.15–0.30) |
| Yes | 73 | 94 | ||
| Breast cancer (women only, n =555) | No | 365 | 69 | 0.241 (0.15–0.34) |
| Yes | 73 | 48 | ||
| Colorectal cancer (n = 775) | No | 571 | 5 | 0.510 (0.44–0.58) |
| Yes | 114 | 85 | ||
EMR—electronic medical record, FH—family history.
*
Strength of agreement30: < 0 = less than chance; 0.01–0.20 = slight agreement; 0.21–0.40 = fair agreement; 0.41–0.60 = moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80 = substantial agreement; and 0.81–0.99 = almost perfect agreement.