Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 19;89(1062):20160009. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160009

Table 3.

Dose to elective nodal levels with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs split-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SF-IMRT), specific to targets in the low neck. VMAT had improved coverage of CTV50 and PTV50, while PTV60 had better coverage of PTV60 but not CTV60

Target structure Parameter VMAT (mean ± SEM) SF-IMRT (mean ± SEM) Number p-values
CTV50 low–intermediate low neck (50 Gy/25 fraction equivalent) V100 99.3 ± 0.2% 91.5 ± 2.4% 10 0.011
PTV50 low–intermediate low neck (50 Gy/25 fraction equivalent) V100 95.6 ± 0.8% 86.0 ± 3.3% 10 0.029
PTV50 CI 0.990 ± 0.003 0.969 ± 0.011 10 0.003
PTV50 DHI 21.9 ± 1.8 27.7 ± 2.7 10 0.148
CTV60 high–intermediate low neck (60 Gy/30 fraction equivalent) V100 98.5 ± 0.8% 97.9 ± 1.3% 3 0.304
PTV60 high–intermediate low neck (60 Gy/30 fraction equivalent) V100 94.6 ± 0.8% 96.9 ± 1.4% 3 0.029
PTV60 CI 0.992 ± 0.002 0.995 ± 0.004 3 0.446
PTV60 DHI 22.2 ± 1.5 19.4 ± 6.1 3 0.692

CI, conformality index; CTV, clinical target volumes; DHI, dose homogeneity index; PTV, planning target volumes; SEM, standard error of the mean; V100, volume receiving 100% of prescription dose.

(±) denotes standard error of the mean.

p-values are in bold when p < 0.05.