Table 3.
Study | CTPA |
VQ scan |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Diagnosis |
Alternative diagnosesa (%) | n | Diagnosis |
|||||
PE (%) | No PE (%) | Indeterminate (%) | PE (%) | No PE (%) | Indeterminate (%) | ||||
Ridge et al (2009)14 | 28 | 0 | 64 | 36 | 3.6 | 25 | 8 | 88 | 4 |
Shahir et al (2010)29,b | 106 | 3.8 | 91 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 98 | 0 | 98 | 2 |
Revel et al (2011)30,c | 43 | 16 | 65 | 19 | 12 | 91 | 11 | 70 | 19 |
This studyd | 23 | 17 | 48 | 35 | 13 | 89 | 12 | 87 | 1 |
CTPA, CT pulmonary angiography; PE, pulmonary embolism; VQ, ventilation/perfusion.
Significant findings not seen on chest radiograph.
CT diagnostic quality: 76% good, 18% acceptable, 5.7% non-diagnostic.
CT enhancement: 50% optimal, 26% suboptimal, 24% poor; 4.7% respiratory artefacts.
35% suboptimal enhancement of subsegmental vessels.