Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2016 Oct 7;55(41):5818–5831. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00834

Table 1.

Diffraction data collection and model statistics

WT CmlA chemically reduced CmlA E377D variant
PDB ID 5KIK 5KIL
Data collection
 Space group P43 21 2 P43 21 2
Cell dimensions
 a, b, c (Å) 153.53, 153.53, 93.04 153.95, 153.95, 92.55
  α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90
Wavelength (Å) 0.97918 0.97933
Resolution (Å) 50–2.20 50–2.72
Total/Unique reflections 488258/58432 217968/30307
Rmerge (%)a,b 13.2 (56.0) 10.2 (47.1)
I/σIa 27 (5.4) 29 (4.8)
Completeness (%)a 98.9 (98.6) 99.7 (99.9)
Redundancya 8.4 (6.8) 7.2 (7.5)
Model Refinement
 Resolution (Å) 44.8–2.20 38.5–2.72
 Rwork, Rfree, test set (%) 0.180, 0.213, 5.3 0.202, 0.262, 5.1
 Average B, all atoms (Å2) 57 63
 ESU (Å)c 0.098 0.229
 Protein atoms in model 4209 4110
RMSDs
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.013 0.019
 Bond angles (°) 1.71 1.97
Ramachandran analysis
 Favored (%) 97 91
 Allowed (%) 3 8
 Outlier (%) 0 1

All data collected on synchrotron beamline APS SBC-CAT 19ID-D

a

Highest resolution shell is shown in parentheses

b

Rsym = ΣhklΣi |Ihkl,i − <I>hkl|/ΣhklΣi|Ihkl,i|, where Ihkl is the intensity of a reflection and <I>hkl is the average of all observations of the reflections in the dataset

c

Estimated overall coordinate error (ESU) based on maximum likelihood RMSD, root mean square deviation from ideal geometry