Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2016 Dec 8;110:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.011

Table 3.

Results of Linear Regression Models Predicting Child Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Controlling for Child Age, Sex and Total Caloric Intake

Parenting practice
Monitoring Restriction

Parenting style Term β (SE) p Critical alpha Term β (SE) p Critical alpha
Authoritative N = 409 N = 407
Intercept 2.83 (0.17) --- --- Intercept 2.80 (0.17) --- ---
ME authoritative 0.21 (0.12) 0.09 0.013 ME authoritative 0.24, (0.12) 0.04 0.010
ME monitoring 0.18 (0.12) 0.15 0.025 ME restriction −0.21 (0.12) 0.08 0.013
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included
Authoritarian N = 408 N = 406
Intercept 2.85 (0.17) --- --- Intercept 2.83 (0.17) --- ---
ME authoritarian −0.16 (0.12) 0.19 0.050 ME authoritarian −0.16 (0.12) 0.20 0.050
ME monitoring 0.21 (0.12) 0.08 0.010 ME restriction −0.19 (0.12) 0.11 0.017
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included
Permissive N = 411 N = 409
Intercept 2.83 (0.16) --- --- Intercept 2.81 (0.17) --- ---
ME permissive −0.33 (0.12) 0.005 0.008 ME permissive −0.33 (0.12) 0.005 0.008
ME monitoring 0.18 (0.12) 0.13 0.017 ME restriction −0.17 (0.12) 0.14 0.025
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included

Note. ME = main effect. All non-significant (NS) interaction terms were dropped from final models. Critical alpha values were derived using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure (Holm, 1979).