Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2016 Dec 8;110:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.011

Table 4.

Results of Linear Regression Models Predicting Child Sugar Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Controlling for Child Age, Sex and Total Caloric Intake

Parenting practice
Monitoring Restriction
Parenting style Term β (SE) p Critical alpha Term β (SE) p Critical alpha
Authoritative N = 409 N = 407
Intercept 0.84 (0.07) --- Intercept 0.85 (0.07) ---
ME authoritative 0.03 (0.05) 0.61 0.017 ME authoritative −0.02 (0.05) 0.77 0.050
ME monitoring −0.15 (0.05) 0.0069 0.010 ME restriction −0.06 (0.05) 0.29 0.013
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included
Authoritarian N = 408 N = 406
Intercept 0.84 (0.07) --- Intercept 0.85 (0.08) ---
ME authoritarian 0.001 (0.05) 0.99 0.050 ME authoritarian 0.03 (0.05) 0.56 0.017
ME monitoring −0.14 (0.05) 0.0065 0.008 ME restriction −0.07 (0.05) 0.22 0.008
Interaction NS/not included Interaction −0.11 (0.05) 0.04 0.007
Permissive N = 411 N = 409
Intercept 0.84 (0.07) --- Intercept 0.84 (0.07) --- ---
ME permissive 0.003 (0.05) 0.95 0.025 ME permissive 0.03 (0.05) 0.58 0.025
ME monitoring −0.14 (0.05) 0.0076 0.013 ME restriction −0.06 (0.05) 0.26 0.010
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included

Note. ME = main effect. All non-significant (NS) interaction terms were dropped from final models. Critical alpha values were derived using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure (Holm, 1979).