Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2016 Dec 8;110:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.011

Table 5.

Results of Linear Regression Models Predicting Child Unhealthy Snack Consumption, Controlling for Child Age, Sex and Total Caloric Intake

Parenting practice
Monitoring Restriction
Parenting style Term β (SE) p Critical alpha Term β (SE) p Critical alpha
Authoritative N = 409 N = 407
Intercept 1.70 (0.10) --- --- Intercept 1.72 (0.10) --- ---
ME authoritative −0.08 (0.08) 0.33 0.008 ME authoritative −0.08 (0.07) 0.26 0.008
ME monitoring −0.04 (0.08) 0.57 0.025 ME restriction 0.04 (0.07) 0.58 0.017
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included
Authoritarian N = 408 N = 406
Intercept 1.70 (0.10) --- --- Intercept 1.72 (0.10) --- ---
ME authoritarian 0.01 (0.07) 0.90 0.050 ME authoritarian 0.002 (0.08) 0.98 0.050
ME monitoring −0.06 (0.07) 0.44 0.010 ME restriction 0.04 (0.07) 0.58 0.017
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included
Permissive N = 411 N = 409
Intercept 1.73 (0.11) --- --- Intercept 1.75 (0.11) --- ---
ME permissive 0.05 (0.08) 0.50 0.013 ME permissive 0.05 (0.08) 0.53 0.013
ME monitoring −0.05 (0.08) 0.55 0.017 ME restriction 0.06 (0.08) 0.46 0.010
Interaction NS/not included Interaction NS/not included

Note. ME = main effect. All non-significant (NS) interaction terms were dropped from final models. Critical alpha values were derived using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure (Holm, 1979).