Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 10;2017:1793213. doi: 10.1155/2017/1793213

Table 3.

Accuracy of beta-barrel modeling from cryo-EM experimental maps at medium resolutions.

EMD_PDB IDa Res.b #Det./#Obs. Strdc 2-w Dist.d #Det./#Obs. AAe
1657_4V5H_AH4 5.8 Å 6/6 1.94 25/30
1780_4V7E_AH4 5.5 Å 5/5 1.88 24/28
1829_4V5H_AH4 5.6 Å 8/6 2.11 25/30
1849_4V6K_AE6 8.25 Å 7/6 2.34 24/40
1849_4V6K_AC6 6/5 1.90 26/31
1849_4V6K_AG2 6/6 2.74 31/52
5030_4V68_AF8 6.4 Å 4/5 1.72 24/32
5036_4V69_AD5 6.7 Å 5/5 1.73 23/29

Average 2.05 202/272 = 74.26%
Standard deviation 0.35

aEMDB_PDB_Sheet ID.

bResolution of the cryo-EM density map.

cThe number of β-traces detected in the best of the fifteen possible sets/the number of β-strands in the β-sheet of the PDB structure.

dThe 2-way distance (in Å) between the observed β-traces and the modeled β-traces for the best of the fifteen possible sets.

eThe number of detected/the total number of amino acids in the β-barrel.