Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jan 24;7:41248. doi: 10.1038/srep41248

The sorting receptor Rer1 controls Purkinje cell function via voltage gated sodium channels

Christina Valkova 1, Lutz Liebmann 2, Andreas Krämer 1, Christian A Hübner 2, Christoph Kaether 1,a
PMCID: PMC5259745  PMID: 28117367

Abstract

Rer1 is a sorting receptor in the early secretory pathway that controls the assembly and the cell surface transport of selected multimeric membrane protein complexes. Mice with a Purkinje cell (PC) specific deletion of Rer1 showed normal polarization and differentiation of PCs and normal development of the cerebellum. However, PC-specific loss of Rer1 led to age-dependent motor deficits in beam walk, ladder climbing and gait. Analysis of brain sections revealed a specific degeneration of PCs in the anterior cerebellar lobe in old animals. Electrophysiological recordings demonstrated severe deficits in spontaneous action potential generation. Measurements of resurgent currents indicated decreased surface densities of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav), but not changes in individual channels. Analysis of mice with a whole brain Rer1-deletion demonstrated a strong down-regulation of Nav1.6 and 1.1 in the absence of Rer1, whereas protein levels of the related Cav2.1 and of Kv3.3 and 7.2 channels were not affected. The data suggest that Rer1 controls the assembly and transport of Nav1.1 and 1.6, the principal sodium channels responsible for recurrent firing, in PCs.


Motor coordination in mammals is controlled by the cerebellum, a part of the hindbrain. Its cortex is composed of three layers, the molecular layer, the Purkinje cell (PC) layer and the granular layer. The PC layer consists of a single layer of PCs, the neurons with the highest synaptic input. Their axons provide the principal output of the cerebellar cortex1. PCs are characterized by spontaneous high-frequency firing mediated by the resurgent voltage-dependent sodium channel (Nav) 1.6 that localizes to the axon initial segment (AIS)2. Nav1.6, encoded by the SCN8A gene, constitutes the pore-forming large α-subunit and associates with a β2/β4 subunit and a β1/β3 subunit3. Another important sodium channel at the AIS of Purkinje cells is Nav1.1 (encoded by SCN1A)4, also critically involved in PC excitability5. Both Nav1.1 and 1.6 are large, glycosylated membrane proteins with four domains, each composed of 6 transmembrane domains (TM), whereas the β-subunits are single-pass TM proteins6. While Navs are anchored to the AIS via ankyrin7,8, less is known about the mechanisms guiding proper folding, assembly and transport of Nav1.1 and 1.6 in the early secretory pathway. Evidence that β-subunits are involved in surface transport of Nav1.6 came from genetic studies9,10. In case of the closely related sodium channel in the heart, Nav1.5, the β1, but not the β2 subunit was shown to associate with α already in the ER11. How Navs assemble, and which mechanisms control and guide their transport through the secretory pathway is largely unknown.

Rer1 is a sorting receptor localized to the cis-Golgi12,13. Similar to the KDEL receptor, it binds to signals in proteins destined for transient or permanent residency in the ER14. In contrast to the KDEL receptor, Rer1 binds to ER-retention/retrieval sequences in TM of target proteins15. Substrates of Rer1 in mammalian cells characterized so far are unassembled subunits of heterologous membrane protein complexes of the plasma membrane (PM)13,16,17 and the multi-pass membrane proteins rhodopsin18 and PMP2219. Rer1 binds to ER-retention/retrieval sequences exposed only in unassembled subunits but masked in assembled subunits20. Rer1 is therefore part of the quality control in the early secretory pathway that ensures that only fully assembled complexes are transported to the PM.

Using PC-specific deletion of Rer1 in mice we here show that loss of Rer1 does not affect normal polarization and differentiation of PCs, but leads to a specific defect in high-frequency firing. This defect results in a strong motor phenotype and degeneration of PCs in old mice. The underlying molecular cause is a reduction in Nav1.1 and 1.6 protein levels, suggesting that Rer1 is involved in the quality control of Nav ion channels.

Results

Rer1-deficiency does not affect normal growth and differentiation of Purkinje cells

Rer1 is expressed throughout the rodent brain. In-situ hybridization and β-Gal activity from a heterozygous gene-trap allele inserted at the Rer1 locus13 indicated a high level of expression in cerebellar PC (Fig. 1a). Immunofluorescence staining of PC with a Rer1-specific antibody demonstrated an early Golgi-localization pattern (Fig. 1a,c, supplemental Fig. 1), as shown in other cell types12,13. Mice homozygous for the gene-trap allele inserted at the Rer1 locus are embryonic lethal at the blastocyst stage13. Therefore, to study the function of Rer1 in vivo we established a conditional knock-out mouse line by inserting loxP sites in intron 2 and 4 (Fig. 1b). Crossing these mice with L7/pcp-2:Cre, a PC specific cre-line21, resulted in offspring with specific Rer1 deletion in PC (Rer1ΔPC), but not cerebellar granule neurons or other cell types (Fig. 1c). Rer1ΔPC mice are viable, fertile, have normal body weight and normal activity (data not shown). Cre-mediated deletion of Rer1 in PC was clearly observed at P13, and was completed at P16 (Fig. 1d). The cerebellum was normally developed without obvious differences in PC number or dendritic tree arborization (Fig. 1c). An indicator for proper development of PCs is the thickness of the molecular layer, because this is primarily determined by the dendritic tree of PCs22,23. No differences in mean thickness were observed in P16-25, P36 and 3 monthss old Rer1ΔPC and control littermates mice (supplemental Fig. 2). Differentiation of PCs (and the cerebellum) is completed at around P21, after cre-recombination. Therefore, these data suggest that Rer1 is not involved in maturation of PCs.

Figure 1. Rer1 is highly expressed in Purkinje cells (PCs) and specifically deleted in Rer1ΔPC mice.

Figure 1

(a) Left: radioactive in-situ hybridization (ISH) of a wt cerebellar section with a Rer1-specific antisense probe; middle: X-Gal staining of a cerebellar slice of a heterozygous Rer1-genetrap mouse with a β-Geo insertion in intron 3 of Rer113. Arrows indicate PC layer; right: immunostaining of a cerebellar slice with Rer1 antibody (red) and calbindin (calb, green). Asterisks indicate PCs. Scalebar 150 μm (left, middle) and 10 μm (right). (b) Targeting strategy for conditional deletion of Rer1. Shown is the genomic structure (top), the position of the loxP sites in the Rerfl/fl allele and the deleted Rer1ΔPC allele after crossing with the PC-specific L7Pcp2-Cre line. (c) Rer1 is specifically deleted in PCs. Vibratome sections of perfused 4 months old animals with the indicated genotype were processed for immunofluorescence with antibodies against Rer1 and calbindin (Calb) and imaged by confocal microscopy. Three consecutive confocal sections were merged. In the lower panel a magnification of the Rer1 staining of the boxed area is shown. PCs are outlined. Scalebar 10 μm. (d) Deletion of Rer1 in PCs starts before P13 and is completed at P16. Sagittal sections from cerebella from perfused Rer1ΔPC of indicated age were stained for Rer1 and images were taken from the anterior lobe at the position indicated in the overview Hoechst-stained image on the right. Scale bar 50 μm for Rer1 staining, 150 μm for Hoechst.

Rer1-deficiency in Purkinje cells results in severe motor deficits

Phenotypic analysis of young (2–3 months) mice on a Rotarod showed no difference between Rer1ΔPC mice and their non-cre expressing littermates, independent of sex (supplemental Fig. 3b and not shown). However, footprint analysis of 14 and 24 months old mice revealed significant gait differences (Fig. 2a–c). When climbing a ladder, 8–12 months old Rer1ΔPC mice made 2.5 times more mistakes than their littermates (2.6 ± 0.7 lapses in 12 Rer1ΔPC vs. 0.04 ± 0.04 lapses in 12 control mice, t-test P = 0.006). Finally, challenging the mice on a 1 cm beam walk demonstrated that Rer1ΔPC mice needed significantly more time to cross the beam, and their difficulties increased with age (Fig. 2d). Motor learning, as judged from the improvement in performing Rotarod and beam walk24 was not affected in Rer1ΔPC mice (suppl. Fig. 3).

Figure 2. Rer1 deletion in Purkinje cells causes motor deficits.

Figure 2

(a–c) Hind paws of mice of indicated age and genotype were stained with ink and the mice were allowed to walk across a paper. Base width and stride length were determined from the footprints. Displayed is the mean from 3 ctrl and 3 Rer1ΔPC 14 months (mo) old mice, 5 ctrl and 5 Rer1ΔPC 24 mo old mice ± SEM. (d) Mice of indicated age and genotype were placed on three consecutive days on a 1 cm broad, 1 m long beam and the time needed for crossing was determined. Displayed is the mean time of 4 ctrl and 4 Rer1ΔPC 4-6 mo, 4 ctrl and 5 Rer1ΔPC 8 mo, 6 ctrl and 6 Rer1ΔPC 10–11 mo old mice ± SEM. Ctrl refers to Rerfl/fl/cre−/− littermates.

Taken together, the motor analysis clearly demonstrated that deletion of Rer1 in PCs results in a severe, age-dependent gait disorder.

Rer1-deficiency in Purkinje cells results in their age-dependent loss

The progressive motor deficits prompted us to analyze cerebellar morphology in young and old mice of both genotypes. The overall size of the cerebellum was not different until 3–5 months of age. However, starting at the age of 6–12 months the anterior part of the cerebellum was smaller in Rer1ΔPC mice. In old mice (≥17 months) the difference was statistically significant (Fig. 3a,b). Calbindin staining revealed an age-dependent, progressive loss of PCs in the anterior part starting at 5 months, where also axonal swellings were detected (Fig. 4a). Glial cells were unchanged, as indicated by GFAP co-staining (Fig. 4a). The axonal swellings, suggestive of sick or dying neurons, became visible in 4 months old Rer1ΔPC mice, and were frequently detected in 9 months old Rer1ΔPC mice but not in littermates (Fig. 4b). These data show that loss of Rer1 in PCs results in an age-dependent PC degeneration, which in turn leads to a selective volume reduction of the anterior cerebellum.

Figure 3. Deletion of Rer1 leads to shrinkage of the cerebellum.

Figure 3

(a) Cerebella from 9 and 17 months (mo) old perfused Rer1ΔPC and control littermates were sectioned and stained with Hoechst. Scalebar, 150 μm. (b) Anterior and posterior parts of cerebella of indicated age and genotype were marked and their area determined and displayed as mean ± SEM. n = 6 (P16-36); n = 6 (3–5 mo); n = 3 (6–12 mo) and n = 7 (≥17 mo); 3–4 sections for each mouse were analyzed. a.u., arbitrary units.

Figure 4. Deletion of Rer1 leads to axonal swellings and degeneration of Purkinje cells.

Figure 4

(a) Cerebellar slices of mice of indicated age and phenotype were immunostained for calbindin (calb, red) and GFAP (green) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Single confocal sections are shown. (b) Cerebellar slices from P36, 4 and 9 months (mo) old Rer1ΔPC mice and control littermates were processed for calbindin immunofluorescence and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Shown are merges of three confocal sections. Arrowheads indicate intact axons of PCs, arrows axonal swellings. Scalebar 20 μm.

Action potential generation is impaired in Rer1-deficient Purkinje cells

The overall morphology of PCs lacking Rer1 was not changed (Fig. 1c). To test whether their electrophysiological properties were affected, patch clamping of PCs of cerebellar slices of 6–7-weeks old Rer1ΔPC and Rer1wt mice was performed in the loose cell-attached mode. High-frequency firing was strongly attenuated in Rer1ΔPC PCs (Fig. 5a,c; Rer1wt: 44.4 ± 7.4 Hz; Rer1ΔPC 8.5 ± 3.1 Hz; Student’s t-test: p = 0.000013; n = 22/31). The percentage of non-spiking PCs was 7-fold increased in slices of Rer1ΔPC compared to preparations of control mice (Fig. 5b; control: 9.1%; Rer1ΔPC 64.5%). After exclusion of all non-spiking neurons from both groups, the analysis still revealed a significant diminished firing frequency of Rer1ΔPC PCs compared with neurons from control slices (Fig. 5a,c; control: 48.8 ± 7.4 Hz; Rer1ΔPC 24.1 ± 7.7 Hz; Student’s t-test: p = 0.042; n = 20/11). Next we measured resurgent currents, a characteristic feature of PCs caused by a special form of sodium channel gating25 in cerebellar slices of 7–8 week old Rer1ΔPC mice and control littermates (Fig. 5d). The amplitude of the resurgent current was significantly reduced in Rer1ΔPC PCs indicating a decrease in density of Nav channels at their surface. Current-voltage relations for peak resurgent currents showed a reduced peak amplitude in Rer1ΔPC mice (Fig. 5e). Interestingly, the decay constant tau at −30 mV was unchanged (11.1 ± 1.9 msec (wt) and 11.5 ± 3.03 msec (ko); Student’s t-test, p > 0.05), suggesting a decrease in density of Nav channels at the cell surface, not changes in kinetic properties of individual channels. These data suggest that deficits in resurgent currents severely affect spontaneous action potential generation in Rer1ΔPC PCs because of reduced amounts of Nav ion channels at the AIS.

Figure 5. Deletion of Rer1 resulted in severe impairment of spontaneous action potential generation and decreased amplitude of resurgent currents in Purkinje cells.

Figure 5

(a) PCs in cerebellar slices of 6–7 weeks old control (ctrl) and Rer1ΔPC mice were patch-clamped in the loose cell-attached mode and high frequency firing was recorded. n, number of cells from 5 ctrl and 4 Rer1ΔPC animals as indicated. Typical recordings for control and Rer1ΔPC cells are shown, respectively. (b) Percentage of spontaneously firing PCs from recordings from a). (c) Mean firing frequency from recordings of PCs from a) including non-spiking cells (+) or excluding them (−). Non-spiking cells were defined as PCs identified by their morphology and typical low membrane resistance measured by establishment of whole cell configuration after cell attached recordings. Displayed is the mean frequency ±SD, Student’s t-test: p = 0.042; n = 20/11. Ctrl refers to Rerfl/fl/cre−/− littermates. (d) Representative voltage clamp traces of resurgent sodium currents after subtraction of recordings with tetrodotoxin from recordings without tetrodotoxin recorded from PCs in cerebellar slices of 7–8 weeks old control and Rer1ΔPC mice. (e) Current-voltage relationship of resurgent sodium currents from (d). n, number of cells from 5 ctrl and 5 Rer1ΔPC mice; two way ANOVA, p < 0.05.

Rer1-deficient Purkinje cells have normal axonal initial segments with reduced Nav1.6 levels

The axonal swellings, the motor phenotype as well as the high-frequency-firing deficits are similar to the phenotype of mice with a PC-specific Nav1.6-deletion26. Action potentials are generated at the AIS, where Nav1.6 is enriched2. We therefore tested whether the structure of the AIS or its molecular composition is dependent on Rer1 and performed co-immunostainings with ankyrin G and Nav1.6 (Fig. 6a, for specificity of Nav1.6 antibody see supplemental Fig. 4). No gross difference was observed in ankyrin G and Nav1.6 distribution between Rer1ΔPC mice and control littermates and the average AIS-length didn’t differ between the two genotypes (14.2 ± 0.3 μm in control, 14.1 ± 0.3 μm in Rer1ΔPC mice; n = 243 AIS from 7 ctrl mice and n = 267 AIS from 8 Rer1ΔPC mice). However, the average intensity of Nav1.6 at the AIS was significantly diminished in PCs of Rer1ΔPC mice, sometimes below the detection limit (Fig. 6a, long arrows). From 152 AIS from control littermates (n = 6) 9,95 ± 1,6% had very low or undetectable Nav1.6 immunostaining. In contrast, from 169 AIS from Rer1ΔPC mice (n = 6) almost three times more AIS (26,3 ± 6%) had very low or undetectable Nav1.6 immunostaining. Consistently, cerebellar lysates of Rer1ΔPC mice had slightly reduced levels of Nav1.6 at P23, before overt loss of PCs (not shown). Since PC only constitute a minor fraction of the cerebellum, and because of the specificity of the deletion, large differences in total cerebellar lysates are unlikely. We therefore made use of another mouse line in which Rer1 is deleted in the whole brain using nestin-cre (RerΔbrain). These mice die early postnatally. Brain lysates from P3, P10 and P15 RerΔbrain mice showed almost complete absence of Rer1, demonstrating successful deletion (Fig. 7a). Rer1 deficiency does not change general brain architecture, indicated by the unchanged protein levels of synaptophysin (p38), PSD95, APP and the early Golgi marker GM130 in brain lysates (Fig. 7a) and by histological analysis (not shown). However, RerΔbrain mice displayed strong reductions in Nav1.6 expression levels (Fig. 7a). Also the protein levels of the closely related Nav1.1 are strongly reduced. In contrast, protein levels of an abundant calcium channel from the same ion channel superfamily, Cav2.1, and of three tested potassium channels Kv1.1, 3.3 and 7.2, as well as the levels of a K-Cl Cotransporter KCC2, are not changed in RerΔbrain mice. Protein levels of the Navβ1 subunit were only slightly reduced in RerΔbrain mice (Fig. 7a). Nav1.1 and 1.6 are complex glycosylated. De-glycosylation using endoglycosidase H (endoH, cleaves only immature sugars on ER/early Golgi-resident proteins) and PNGase F (F, removes all N-linked sugars) showed that the higher, prominent band in Nav1.1 and Nav1.6 is endoH resistant (Fig. 7b). This fraction corresponds to the mature channel at the PM, while the weaker, faster migrating band is endoH sensitive, corresponding to the immature fraction of the channel in the ER/early Golgi that is not yet fully folded and/or assembled (Fig. 7b). Only the mature Nav1.1 and 1.6 levels are strongly reduced in the absence of Rer1 and no accumulation of immature channels is observed (Fig. 7a). This suggests that in the absence of Rer1 misfolded and/or unassembled Nav1.1 and 1.6 escape the ER quality control and are degraded in later compartments, similar to the acetylcholine receptor13. Rer1 is not involved in controlling Cav or Kv channels and not or only to a minor degree in β1.

Figure 6. Reduced Nav1.6 expression at axon initial segments of Rer1-deficient Purkinje cells.

Figure 6

(a) Cerebellar sections of 34 days old Rer1ΔPC and control littermates mice (ctrl) were stained with antibodies against Nav1.6 and ankyrinG and imaged by confocal microscopy. 3 confocal sections were merged. Scalebar 10 μm. (b) Nav1.6 fluorescence intensities in the axon initial segment (AIS) were determined from sections of cerebella processed as in a). Displayed are the mean ± SEM of 243 AIS from 7 ctrl mice and 267 AIS from 8 Rer1ΔPC mice. a.u., arbitrary units. Ctrl refers to Rerfl/fl/cre−/− littermates.

Figure 7. Absence of Rer1 reduces Nav protein levels.

Figure 7

(a) Brain lysates of Rer1Δbrain (ko) and control littermates (wt) of different ages as indicated were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted and probed with indicated antibodies. In the Cav2.1 blot the irrelevant lane #7 was removed and the two last lanes flipped vertically, to match loading of the other gels. See full-length blot in the supplemental Fig. 5. P38, synaptophysin. (b) De-glycosylation of Nav1.1 and 1.6 indicates maturation status of the different bands. Brain lysates of P15 wt mice were subjected to de-glycosylation with endoglycosidase H (H) or PNGaseF (F) and processed for Western Blotting with Nav1.1 and 1.6 antibodies. Im, immature (endoH sensitive); m, mature (endoH resistant); degl, de-glycosylated Nav1.1 or 1.6 after PNGase F digest. In a, b cropped blots are shown, full-length blots are shown in supplemental Figs 5,6.

Taken together, we show that loss of Rer1 in PC elicits a very specific phenotype with a loss of functionality of PCs causing severe motor deficits and age-dependent degeneration. Rer1 is essential for the key property of PCs, their ability to generate high-frequency action potentials, by specifically controlling protein levels of mature Nav ion channels.

Discussion

The PC, and a neuron in general, is an incredibly complex information processing entity. It only functions properly if a plethora of proteins and mechanisms interact like cogs mesh in a gearbox. For example, for generation of the resurgent Na+ current that is essential for action potentials in PCs, a specific voltage-dependent Na-channel, the Nav1.6, with its multiple TM domains needs to be co-translationally inserted into the ER, properly folded, assembled with the correct β-subunit(s), transported through the Golgi, sorted into vesicles destined for the AIS, inserted there, and fulfill its function as an ion channel. We here show that a disturbance at one or a few of these steps has dramatic consequences. Loss of Rer1, and thus disturbance of the quality control system that ensures proper folding and assembly of multimeric complexes, leads to lower amounts of mature Nav1.1 and 1.6 in PCs. This results in almost complete failure of the constant firing of action potentials, which in turn results in the severe motor phenotypes we observed in older mice. PCs fail to generate action potentials at a very young age, and maybe were never able to do so. We could not determine the earliest time point where motor problems can be detected. Yet, the development of motor phenotypes is clearly age-dependent, similar to other cerebellar mouse mutants27, probably because of initial compensation for loss of function. In contrast, the early complete loss of PCs at P15-30 in the Pcd mice results in early ataxia28,29 and problems on the Rotarod already at P2030. In mice with a PC-specific deletion of Nav1.6 early ataxia and impaired Rotarod performance was observed at 6–8 wks26. Why our Rer1ΔPC do not show motor coordination problems on the Rotarod is unclear, but could be due to the rather insensitive Rotarod29 or because of residual Nav1.1 and 1.6 that correctly assemble and make it to the AIS in the absence of Rer1. Interestingly, motor learning as assessed from the learning curves on Rotarod and beam walk was not affected by the deletion of Rer1, similar to the tambaleante mice, where PCs are lost after 4–6 months24. However, for a detailed analysis of motor learning eyeblink classical conditioning needs to be performed, as for example described in ref. 31.

PCs without Rer1 are normally developed and maintained to young adulthood. However, they start to degenerate in adult mice, maybe as a consequence of the loss of functionality. This degeneration leads to reduction of cerebellar size in old mice and probably contributes to the severe motor phenotypes. Interestingly, the degeneration affects mainly the anterior lobe, although Rer1 is deleted in the whole cerebellum. The underlying cause is not known, but patterned or area-selective cell death of PC has been frequently observed (reviewed in ref. 32). The most prominent pattern in PCs is the pattern of zebrin-positive and zebrin-negative zones, with the PCs in the respective zone having distinct electrophysiological properties33. Expression of Rer1 is similar in PCs from all areas of the cerebellum and is not patterned. Unlike for example in model mouse lines of Niemann-Pick Type C disease34,35, in Rer1ΔPC mice PC degeneration seems uniform and not patterned. However, since in the anterior lobe the zebrin-negative areas dominate (where we see the prominent PC loss), a potential correlation has to be analyzed in more detail in future studies.

The evidence that disturbances in voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.1 and 1.6 homeostasis are the main cause for the observed phenotype is several fold. PC-specific deletion of Nav1.626, loss-of-function-mutation in Nav1.15 and deletion of Rer1 (this study) in mice caused very similar phenotypes. All models displayed severe motor deficits caused by a strongly reduced firing rate of PCs. Both Levin et al.26 and we observed swellings in axons of PCs and we additionally observed PC degeneration and cerebellar shrinkage in older mice, which was not analyzed by Levin et al.26. Expression levels of Nav1.1 and 1.6 are strongly reduced in the absence of Rer1. The protein levels of β1 are only slightly reduced, suggesting it is not a direct substrate of Rer1. In addition, it was shown that loss of scn1b (coding for the β1 subunit) leads to a reduction in Nav1.6 with a concomitant up-regulation of Nav1.136, which we did not observe in our mice. This argues against Rer1 acting via β1 on Nav1.1 and 1.6. The β2-subunit does not seem to be involved in assembly of Nav. Deletion of its gene, scn2b, causes only mild phenotypes unrelated to the motor deficits observed here37. Rer1 seems to act specifically on Nav channels, not on closely related Cav and on Kv channels.

A number of substrates for Rer1 have been identified13,16,17,18,19, but in vivo evidence for Rer1 function in mammals was scarce. We here provide in vivo evidence of the role of Rer1 in a specific cell type, the murine PC. Importantly, the deletion of Rer1 in our model occurs at a stage where the PCs (and the cerebellum) are not yet fully developed. Yet, loss of Rer1 had no observable effect on the thickness of the molecular layer, indicative of a normally developed dendritic tree22,23. Altogether, this strongly suggests that major developmental pathways are not affected and that Rer1 is not a general sorting receptor. Instead, Rer1 probably has only a very limited number of substrates. Specifically in PC the most prominent substrate seems to be Navs, but in the current study we cannot rule out that there are additional substrates of Rer1 in PC. Using morpholinos and siRNA against Rer1 in zebrafish and mammalian cells, respectively, resulted in shorter primary cilia and developmental defects38. We find no evidence for a developmental role of Rer1 in PC, but cannot rule out that a deletion at an earlier time point would have an effect. Primary cilia in PCs were difficult to detect in our hands, but primary cilia length was not changed in the hippocampus of brains with forebrain-specific Rer1 deletion (by CamKII-cre; mean ciliary length in dendrate gyrus was 5.5 ± 0.2 pixels in wt, 6.0 ± 0.3 pixels in KO mice, in CA1 region 10.4 ± 0.5 pixels in wt, 11.4 ± 0,4 pixels in KO mice). This suggested Rer1 is not involved in cilia function in mammalian postnatal brain, but might be important for cilia formation in different organs or organisms.

Further work is needed to characterize the exact mechanism of Rer1 involvement in Nav biogenesis. In analogy to the role of Rer1 in acetylcholine receptor assembly13, we hypothesize that the assembly rates of Nav are reduced. Free subunits, normally returned by Rer1, escape the ER/cis-Golgi and get degraded, probably in lysosomes, and this results in the reduced total levels of mature Nav.

Mutations in SCN1A (encoding Nav1.1) are among the most frequent mutations in epilepsy39,40 and mutations in SCNA8A, the gene encoding Nav1.6, were found in patients with epileptic encephalopathy and mental disabilities41. Mutations leading to increased channel activity might lead to seizures, whereas reduced activity might lead to intellectual disabilities41. Not surprisingly, Navs are major drug targets42. Future work has to elucidate to what extent Rer1 controls Nav channels also in other brain areas besides the cerebellum and whether it might be a novel therapeutic target. Increasing Rer1 levels or stabilizing its interaction with Nav might overcome deficits caused by loss-of-function or hypomorphic mutations, similar to other rescue approaches43,44. A partial rescue might be sufficient, as has been shown in the case of mutations in Nav1.1 where a partial rescue by lowering temperature or co-expressing binding proteins resulted in a constitutive gain-of-function43. In case of over-active mutations reducing Rer1 levels or Nav1.6 interactions might be beneficial.

In conclusion, we here present the first in vivo data how a member of the ER/Golgi quality control machinery, the sorting receptor Rer1, controls a specific class of voltage-gated sodium ion channels that are essential for the electrical properties of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Methods

Antibodies

The following antibodies were used. Anti-Rer1, rabbit polyclonal SA5457 and SPY00813; anti-calbindin-D-28K, mouse monoclonal (C-9848), anti-MAP2 mouse monoclonal M4403 and anti-GFAP, rabbit polyclonal (G-9269), all from Sigma; anti-Nav1.6 (ASC-009), anti-Nav1.1 (ASC-001), anti-Cav2.1 (ACC-001), anti-Kv1.1 (APC-009), anti-Kv3.3 (APC-102) and anti-Kv7.2 (APC-050), all rabbit polyclonal from Alomone Labs; anti-ankyrin G mouse monoclonal (sc-12719), Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-Scn1b, rabbit polyclonal (AP53815 PU-N), Acris; anti-APP, mouse monoclonal (MAB348), Millipore; anti-PSD-95, mouse monoclonal (6G6-1C9, VAM-PS002), Assay Designs; anti-KCC2, rabbit polyclonal (07–432) and anti-synaptophysin mouse monoclonal (MAB368) both from Millipore, anti-GM130, mouse monoclonal (610822) BD Transduction Laboratories; anti-Sstr3, rabbit polyclonal antibody kindly obtained from Stefan Schulz, Jena45; Alexa Fluor-labeled secondary antibodies, Molecular Probes, HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, Promega.

Targeted inactivation of murine Rer1

The Rer1 conditional KO mice were generated by TaconicArtemis (now Taconic Biosciences GmbH), Cologne, Germany. Exons 3–4 were flanked by LoxP sites. Positive selection markers were flanked by FRT (NeoR) and F3 (PuroR) sites and inserted into intron 2 and intron 4, respectively. A targeting vector was generated using BAC clones from a C57BL/6J RPCI-23 BAC library and transfected into TaconicArtemis C57BL/6N Tac ES cell line. After isolation of homologous recombinant clones using positive (Neomycin and Puromycin resistances) and negative (Thymidine kinase - Tk) selections, the conditional KO allele was obtained after Flp-mediated removal of selection markers. Chimeric mice were generated by blastocyst injection, germline transmitters selected and kept in C57Bl/6 background. For conditional inactivation of Rer1, Rer1fl/fl mice were crossed with L7/pcp-2:Cre mice (for specific Purkinje cell deletion21) or with nestin-cre mice (for CNS-specific deletion46) or with CamKII-cre (for forebrain-specific deletion47).

Mice

All animal experiments were conducted according to the German animal welfare legislation and approved by the Thüringer Landesverwaltungsamt (reg. nr 03-008/12). Mice were fed ad libitum with standard laboratory chow and water in ventilated cages under a 12 h light/dark cycle.

Motor coordination tests

Gait analysis

Female mouse hind paws were painted with non-toxic, water-soluble ink and footprint patterns were analyzed using a runway (80 cm ×10.5 cm wide) with white paper on the bottom. Five consecutive strides were measured from three runs of each animal.

Ladder-climbing

Female mice were habituated to climb to their home cage on a 1,1 m long ladder inclined to 22,5° angle with steps 2 cm apart and the average number of lapses was counted from video-recordings from 3 runs per mice. Male mice behaved identically (data not shown).

Beam walking

Female mice were trained to run along a 1 m long beam (3 cm thick) to their home cage. The test was performed on three consecutive days on a 2 cm thick beam followed by three consecutive days on a 1 cm thick beam with two runs each day. The mice were video-taped and the time to cross the beam and the number of foot slips were measured. Male mice behaved identically (data not shown).

Electrophysiology

Slice preparation for electrophysiological recordings

350-μm-thick brain slices were prepared from 6–7 weeks old mice of either sex and equilibrated in aCSF (in mM): 120 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.3 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 10 D-glucose, 25.0 NaHCO3, gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2, pH 7.3 at room temperature for at least 1 h as described previously48.

Patch clamp recordings

Coronal cerebellar slices were placed in a submerged recording chamber mounted on an upright microscope (BX51WI, Olympus). Slices were continuously superfused with gassed aCSF (2–3 ml/min, 32 °C, pH 7.3). Loose-patch cell attached recordings (seal resistance < 1 GΩ) were performed under visual control with a 40x water-immersion DIC objective. Purkinje-neurons with typical dendritic trees and large cell bodies were selected for recordings using a patch-clamp amplifier (Multiclamp 700B, Molecular Devices). Responses were low-pass filtered at 4 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz (Digidata 1440, Molecular Devices). All data were acquired, stored, and analyzed using pClamp 10.2 and Clampfit 10.2 (Molecular Devices). Patch pipettes with an impedance of 3–4 MΩ were pulled from borosilicate glass (outer diameter 1.5 mm, Science Products GmbH) on a Sutter Instrument micropipette puller (P-97) and filled with aCSF. Spike frequencies were calculated for each cell from recordings with a minimal duration of 1 min. For voltage clamp recordings of resurgent sodium currents from Purkinje neurons of acute cerebellar slices a slightly modified protocol was used as described previously49. As extracellular solution served a modified aCSF (in mM): 110 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.3 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 10 TEA-chloride (tetraethylammonium chloride), 0.04 CdCl2, 10 D-glucose and 25 NaHCO3, gassed with 95% O2/5%CO2, pH7.3. Patch pipettes were filled with (in mM): 135 CSF, 1 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.5 Na-GTP, 10 HEPES, 5 EGTA adjusted to pH 7.3 with CsOH. After whole-cell configuration was established, cells were recorded. From a holding potential of −90 mV cells were depolarized to + 30 mV for 3 ms followed by steps from −50 mV to 0 mV with an increment of 5 mV. For determination of the resurgent current amplitudes 1 μM tetrodotoxin was applied and the protocol was repeated and subtracted from the initial recording. The time constant (τ) was determined by monoexponential fitting.

Immunohistochemistry

Mice of either sex were anesthetized with Isoflurane and perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The brain tissue was post-fixed in 4% PFA/PBS overnight at 4° C, washed in PBS and embedded in 4% agarose. 50 μm thick sagittal brain sections were obtained using a vibratom and were stored in PBS with 0.05% NaN3 at 4° C.

For immunostainings vibratom sections were mounted on Superfrost® Plus microscope slides (ThermoScientific) and air dried. For antigen retrieval the sections were placed in pre-warmed 10 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 6.0, briefly boiled and incubated for 10 min at sub-boiling temperature (10%) in a microwave followed by 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS the sections were incubated for 1 h in blocking solution (5% normal goat serum, 1% BSA and 0,4% Triton X-100 in PBS) and then overnight at 4° C with primary antibodies in blocking solution, washed with PBS, then incubated for 1 hour at RT with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000) and Hoechst and after wash with PBS were mounted in Fluoromount (F4680, Sigma).

In-situ hybridization

Radioactive in-situ hybridization using a full-length mouse Rer1 cDNA in pBluescript was performed as described50.

Immunoblotting

Brain tissues of mice of either sex were lysed in STEN-lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP40 and protease inhibitor mix) or in Complexolyte 48 buffer (Logopharm) with protease inhibitor mix using Precellys beads (1,4 mm) and the Precellys 24 lysis and homogenization device for 2 × 15 sec at 5000 rpm (PeqLab). Proteins were separated on 6% SDS-PAGE gels (for detection of Nav, Cav), 10% for detection of Kv, KCC2 or 12% gels (for detection of Rer1, Navβ1, PSD-95, APP, p38 and GM130) and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were cut at appropriate positions and blotted with antibodies as indicated.

Microscopy and image quantifications

For higher resolution immunhistochemistry a Zeiss 510 Meta LSM equipped with 25x/0.8 NA and 40x/1.3NA objectives was used. For overviews of cerebellar morphology an Olympus AX70 with 4x/0.10 NA objective was used. For the primary cilia length and molecular layer thickness determination a Zeiss Observer Z1 equipped with 10x/0.3NA and 20x/0.8NA objective and an Apotome slider was used. The thickness of the molecular layer was measured on 2D images of calbindin-immunostainings of the cerebellum along the III-IV and VIII-IX lobes at six positions at each lobe in 2–3 midsagittal sections per mouse (3 wt and 3 Rer1ΔPC mice). For measurement of cilia length 3 sagittal sections per mouse (3 wt and 3 Rer1ΔFN mice) were stained with anti-sstr3 antibody45. ApoTome sections from CA1 and DG regions of the hippocampus were taken and 3D reconstructions of were made using ZEN software. The length of cilia (in pixels) was measured using the polygon curve tool. At least 200 cilia were measured per region of the hippocampus. The anterior and posterior cerebellar areas were measured on 2D images of Hoechst-stainings of three mid-sagittal sections per mouse (3 ctrl and 3 Rer1ΔPC mice). Using NIH ImageJ software the anterior area was measured within a line drawn around the lobes I-V51 that are anterior from the primary fissure and respectively the posterior area was measured within a line drown around the lobes VI-IX that are posterior from the primary fissure. For measurement of the axon initial segment confocal images from midsagittal sections stained with anti-ankyrin G and anti-Nav1.6 antibodies were obtained using identical settings. Image stacks were converted into a maximal intensity Z-axis projection and measurements were performed. The fluorescence intensity of Nav1.6 was measured using NIH ImageJ software by drawing a segmented line along the length of the Ankyrin G signal at the AIS. The background fluorescence was subtracted based on a 1 μm segment distal to the AIS. The AIS fluorescence density was calculated as integrated density divided by the AIS length.

Statistical analysis

Data are always presented as mean + /− SEM and the numbers of experiments or mice (n) are indicated. The unpaired Student’s t-test was applied to evaluate differences between experimental groups (GraphPad Prism software). P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. One asterisk P ≤ 0.05; two asterisks P ≤ 0.01; three asterisks P ≤ 0.001.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Valkova, C. et al. The sorting receptor Rer1 controls Purkinje cell function via voltage gated sodium channels. Sci. Rep. 7, 41248; doi: 10.1038/srep41248 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures
srep41248-s1.pdf (6MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KA1751/2-2 (to CK) and HU 800/10-1 (to CAH). We thank Stefan Schulz, University Jena, for sstr3 antibodies, Alan Goldin, UCI, for SCN8a cDNA, Tobias Huth, University Erlangen, for help in PC preparation and for helpful discussions, Michael Zocher, FLI, for in-situ hybridization and Johannes Krug, FLI, for quantification help.

Footnotes

Author Contributions C.V. and A.K. performed all experiments except electrophysiology, which was performed by L.L. and C.A.H. C.K. planned experiments, discussed data and together with all authors wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Kandel E. R., Schwartz J. H. & Jessel T. M. Principles of Neural Science. Fourth edition edn, (McGraw-Hill, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. Lorincz A. & Nusser Z. Cell-type-dependent molecular composition of the axon initial segment. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 28, 14329–14340 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Leterrier C., Brachet A., Fache M. P. & Dargent B. Voltage-gated sodium channel organization in neurons: protein interactions and trafficking pathways. Neurosci Lett 486, 92–100 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duflocq A., Le Bras B., Bullier E., Couraud F. & Davenne M. Nav1.1 is predominantly expressed in nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments. Mol Cell Neurosci 39, 180–192 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kalume F., Yu F. H., Westenbroek R. E., Scheuer T. & Catterall W. A. Reduced sodium current in Purkinje neurons from Nav1.1 mutant mice: implications for ataxia in severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. J Neurosci 27, 11065–11074 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu F. H., Yarov-Yarovoy V., Gutman G. A. & Catterall W. A. Overview of molecular relationships in the voltage-gated ion channel superfamily. Pharmacological reviews 57, 387–395 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkins S. M. & Bennett V. Ankyrin-G coordinates assembly of the spectrin-based membrane skeleton, voltage-gated sodium channels, and L1 CAMs at Purkinje neuron initial segments. The Journal of cell biology 155, 739–746 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barry J. et al. Ankyrin-G directly binds to kinesin-1 to transport voltage-gated Na + channels into axons. Developmental cell 28, 117–131 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vacher H. & Trimmer J. S. Trafficking mechanisms underlying neuronal voltage-gated ion channel localization at the axon initial segment. Epilepsia 53 Suppl 9, 21–31 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Patino G. A. & Isom L. L. Electrophysiology and beyond: multiple roles of Na + channel beta subunits in development and disease. Neurosci Lett 486, 53–59 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zimmer T., Biskup C., Bollensdorff C. & Benndorf K. The beta1 subunit but not the beta2 subunit colocalizes with the human heart Na + channel (hH1) already within the endoplasmic reticulum. J Membr Biol 186, 13–21 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Füllekrug J. et al. Human Rer1 is localized to the Golgi apparatus and complements the deletion of the homologous Rer1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Cell Biol 74, 31–40 (1997). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Valkova C. et al. Sorting receptor Rer1 controls surface expression of muscle acetylcholine receptors by ER retention of unassembled alpha-subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 621–625 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sato K., Sato M. & Nakano A. Rer1p as common machinery for the endoplasmic reticulum localization of membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 9693–9698 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sato K., Sato M. & Nakano A. Rer1p, a retrieval receptor for ER membrane proteins, recognizes transmembrane domains in multiple modes. Mol Biol Cell 14, 3605–3616 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spasic D. et al. Rer1p competes with APH-1 for binding to nicastrin and regulates {gamma}-secretase complex assembly in the early secretory pathway. J Cell Biol 176, 629–640 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaether C. et al. Endoplasmic reticulum retention of the gamma-secretase complex component Pen2 by Rer1. EMBO Rep 8, 743–748 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yamasaki A. et al. Rer1p regulates the ER retention of immature rhodopsin and modulates its intracellular trafficking. Scientific reports 4, 5973 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hara T. et al. Rer1 and calnexin regulate endoplasmic reticulum retention of a peripheral myelin protein 22 mutant that causes type 1A Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Scientific reports 4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fassler M. et al. Masking of transmembrane-based retention signals controls ER export of gamma-secretase. Traffic 11, 250–258 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Barski J. J., Dethleffsen K. & Meyer M. Cre recombinase expression in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Genesis 28, 93–98 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Portella A. C. et al. Thyroid hormone receptor beta mutation causes severe impairment of cerebellar development. Mol Cell Neurosci 44, 68–77 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mayerl S. et al. Transporters MCT8 and OATP1C1 maintain murine brain thyroid hormone homeostasis. The Journal of clinical investigation 124, 1987–1999 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Porras-Garcia M. E., Ruiz R., Perez-Villegas E. M. & Armengol J. A. Motor learning of mice lacking cerebellar Purkinje cells. Front Neuroanat 7, 4 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lewis A. H. & Raman I. M. Resurgent current of voltage-gated Na(+) channels. J Physiol 592, 4825–4838 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Levin S. I. et al. Impaired motor function in mice with cell-specific knockout of sodium channel Scn8a (NaV1.6) in cerebellar purkinje neurons and granule cells. J Neurophysiol 96, 785–793 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. De Zeeuw C. I. et al. Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the cerebellum. Nat Rev Neurosci 12 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mullen R. J., Eicher E. M. & Sidman R. L. Purkinje cell degeneration, a new neurological mutation in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73, 208–212 (1976). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vinueza Veloz M. F. et al. Cerebellar control of gait and interlimb coordination. Brain Struct Funct 220, 3513–3536 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Baltanas F. C. et al. Purkinje cell degeneration in pcd mice reveals large scale chromatin reorganization and gene silencing linked to defective DNA repair. J Biol Chem 286, 28287–28302 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Der Giessen R. S. et al. Role of olivary electrical coupling in cerebellar motor learning. Neuron 58, 599–612 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sarna J. R. & Hawkes R. Patterned Purkinje cell death in the cerebellum. Progress in neurobiology 70, 473–507 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhou H. et al. Cerebellar modules operate at different frequencies. eLife 3, e02536 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarna J. R. et al. Patterned Purkinje cell degeneration in mouse models of Niemann-Pick type C disease. J Comp Neurol 456, 279–291 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marques A. R. et al. Reducing GBA2 Activity Ameliorates Neuropathology in Niemann-Pick Type C Mice. PloS one 10 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Brackenbury W. J. et al. Functional reciprocity between Na + channel Nav1.6 and beta1 subunits in the coordinated regulation of excitability and neurite outgrowth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 2283–2288 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen C. et al. Reduced sodium channel density, altered voltage dependence of inactivation, and increased susceptibility to seizures in mice lacking sodium channel beta 2-subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 17072–17077 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jurisch-Yaksi N. et al. Rer1p maintains ciliary length and signaling by regulating gamma-secretase activity and Foxj1a levels. J Cell Biol 200, 709–720 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Eijkelkamp N. et al. Neurological perspectives on voltage-gated sodium channels. Brain 135, 2585–2612 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Parihar R. & Ganesh S. The SCN1A gene variants and epileptic encephalopathies. Journal of human genetics 58, 573–580 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. O’Brien J. E. & Meisler M. H. Sodium channel SCN8A (Nav1.6): properties and de novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathy and intellectual disability. Frontiers in genetics 4 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. de Lera Ruiz M. & Kraus R. L. Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels: Structure, Function, Pharmacology, and Clinical Indications. J Med Chem (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cestele S., Schiavon E., Rusconi R., Franceschetti S. & Mantegazza M. Nonfunctional NaV1.1 familial hemiplegic migraine mutant transformed into gain of function by partial rescue of folding defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 17546–17551 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Bechi G. et al. Rescuable folding defective NaV1.1 (SCN1A) mutants in epilepsy: properties, occurrence, and novel rescuing strategy with peptides targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum. Neurobiol Dis 75, 100–114 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Händel M. et al. Selective targeting of somatostatin receptor 3 to neuronal cilia. Neuroscience 89, 909–926 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Betz U. A., Vosshenrich C. A., Rajewsky K. & Muller W. Bypass of lethality with mosaic mice generated by Cre-loxP-mediated recombination. Curr Biol 6, 1307–1316 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Minichiello L. et al. Essential role for TrkB receptors in hippocampus-mediated learning. Neuron 24, 401–414 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liebmann L. et al. Differential effects of corticosterone on the slow afterhyperpolarization in the basolateral amygdala and CA1 region: possible role of calcium channel subunits. J Neurophysiol 99, 958–968 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Huth T., Rittger A., Saftig P. & Alzheimer C. beta-Site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) cleaves cerebellar Na + channel beta4-subunit and promotes Purkinje cell firing by slowing the decay of resurgent Na + current. Pflugers Arch 461 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Heuer H., Schafer M. K., O’Donnell D., Walker P. & Bauer K. Expression of thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2 (TRH-R2) in the central nervous system of rats. J Comp Neurol 428, 319–336 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schmahmann J. D. et al. Three-dimensional MRI atlas of the human cerebellum in proportional stereotaxic space. Neuroimage 10, 233–260 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
srep41248-s1.pdf (6MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES