Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2016 May 11;13(3):036023. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036023

Table 2.

Changes in Model Predictions with Increasing Complexity in the Head Model

Tissue properties1 Metric2
load
(kΩ)
MAD Φ3
(%)
MAD Vth3
(%)
homogeneous, isotropic 0.82 N/A N/A
heterogeneous, isotropic3 0.98 24 22
heterogeneous, anisotropic (Tuch CPR)4 0.68 37 190
heterogeneous, anisotropic (classical) 4 0.87 19 97
heterogeneous, anisotropic (volume conservation) 4 0.96 4.8 56
heterogeneous, anisotropic (load preservation) 4 1.01 1.9 48
heterogeneous, anisotropic (load preservation),
  dielectric dispersion5
1.07 0.6 0.30
1

The different approaches (italicized) for defining anisotropy are summarized in section 2.3.

2

The electrical load of contact 0 (Model 3387) in the subthalamic nucleus at t = 70 µs, the median absolute difference (MAD) in the electric potentials, and the MAD in the stimulation thresholds of corticospinal track axons.

3

MAD is between the heterogeneous, isotropic case and the homogeneous, isotropic case.

4

MAD is between the heterogeneous, anisotropic cases and the heterogeneous, isotropic case.

5

MAD is between the heterogeneous, anisotropic case with load preservation and the same case with dielectric dispersion