Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 24;7:41057. doi: 10.1038/srep41057

Table 7. Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of progression-free survival and overall survival.

Risk Factor PFS
Risk Factor OS
Hazard ratio 95% CI p Hazard ratio 95% CI p
Patients with B-PET (n = 47)       Patients with B-PET (n = 47)      
PET (SUVmax ≥ 15.1 vs. <15.1) 1.239 0.442–3.472 0.683 B-PET (SUVmax ≥ 15.1 vs. <15.1) 6.671 1.413–31.501 0.017
PET (MTV ≥ 16.11 vs. <16.11) 2.313 0.827–6.472 0.110 PET (MTV ≥ 16.11 vs. <16.11) 1.209 0.303–4.824 0.788
PET (TLG ≥ 45.90 vs. <45.90) 6.940 1.413–34.12 0.017 PET (TLG ≥ 45.90 vs. <45.90) 8.632 1.090–68.336 0.041
B symptoms (Yes vs. No) 1.010 0.341–2.991 0.986 Ann Arbor Stage (III/IV vs. I/II) 1.100 0.291–4.148 0.889
KPI score (3–4 vs. 0–2) 1.536 0.592–3.988 0.378 KPI score (3–4 vs. 0–2) 1.852 0.515–6.665 0.346
Patients with I-PET (n = 34)       Patients with I-PET (n = 34)      
I-PET (positive vs. negative) 5.355 1.646–17.424 0.005 I-PET (positive vs. negative) 5.596 1.159–27.015 0.032
B symptoms (Yes vs. No) 3.690 1.012–13.451 0.048 Ann Arbor Stage (III/IV vs. I/II) 4.333 1.081–17.371 0.038
LDH level (>245 vs. ≤245) 1.902 0.600–6.027 0.274 KPI score (3–4 vs. 0–2) 1.211 0.175–8.397 0.846
KPI score (3–4 vs. 0–2) 1.491 0.401–5.542 0.551        
Patients with E-PET (n = 28)       Patients with E-PET (n = 28)      
E-PET (positive vs. negative) 3.926 1.189–12.963 0.025 E-PET (positive vs. negative) 4.740 1.127–19.939 0.034
IPI score (2–5 vs. 0–1) 2.374 0.687–8.201 0.172 IPI score 1.124 0.233–5.421 0.884
KPI score (3–4 vs. 0–2) 1.044 0.250–4.366 0.953 KPI score (3–4 vs. 0–2) 2.135 0.457–9.978 0.335

B-PET, baseline PET/CT; I-PET, interim PET/CT; E-PET, end-of-treatment PET/CT; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; WBMTV, whole-body metabolic tumour volume; WBTLG, whole-body total lesion glycolysis; KPI, Korean prognostic index.