Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 24;17:72. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3056-4

Table 2.

Neuroendocrine breast carcinomas compared to the prospective set of ductal carcinomas

NEBC (n = 39) Ductal carcinomas (n = 506) p-value
Median age at diagnosis 66.0 57.0 <0.0005
T class 0.40
 T1 28 (71.8%) 322 (63.6%)
 T2 9 (23.1%) 167 (33.0%)
 T3 2 (5.1%) 12 (2.4%)
 T4 0 (0.0%) 5 (1.0%)
N class 0.72
 N0 23 (59.0%) 314 (62.1%)
 N1 10 (25.6%) 149 (29.4%)
 N2 5 (12.8%) 41 (8.1%)
 N3 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.4%)
Missing 1 (2.6%) 0 (0.0%)
HER2 expression 0.046
 Negative 37 (94.9%) 437 (86.4%)
 Positive 1 (2.6%) 69 (13.6%)
 Missing 1 (2.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Estrogen receptor expression 0.0062
 Negative 1 (2.6%) 103 (20.4%)
 Low 0 (0.0%) 18 (3.6%)
 Moderate 0 (0.0%) 25 (4.9%)
 High 37 (94.9%) 360 (71.1%)
 Missing 1 (2.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Progesterone receptor expression 0.088
 Negative 4 (10.3%) 148 (29.2%)
 Low 4 (10.3%) 61 (12.1%)
 Moderate 5 (12.8%) 57 (11.3%)
 High 25 (61.5%) 240 (47.4%)
 Missing 2 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%)
Ki-67 0.060
 Negative 0 (0.0%) 32 (6.3%)
 Low 14 (35.9%) 217 (43.1%)
 Moderate 15 (38.5%) 116 (23.0%)
 High 8 (20.5%) 139 (27.6%)
 Missing 2 (5.1%) 2 (0.4%)
Adjuvant radiotherapy 0.23
 No 8 (20.5%) 66 (13.4%)
 Yes 31 (79.5%) 427 (86.6%)
Adjuvant chemotherapy 0.00070
 No 27 (69.2%) 207 (40.2%)
 Yes 12 (30.8%) 299 (59.1%)
Adjuvant endocrine therapy 0.015
 No 7 (17.9%) 191 (37.7%)
 Yes 32 (82.1%) 315 (62.3%)

Legend 2. Prognostic factors and adjuvant treatments of neuroendocrine breast carcinomas (NEBC) compared to the prospective set of ductal carcinomas. Primary metastasized cancers have been excluded. Missing values have not been included to the analysis