Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 24;49:12. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0289-2

Table 3.

QTL regions for conformation traits and the most significant SNP within each region in three pig breeds

Trait n Chr QTL region Most significant SNP Candidate genesb
Right position (bp) Left position (bp) SNPa P value Effect size (%)
Landrace
BACK 41 1 63,345,571 68,207,754 rs80850790 3.53 × 10−8 0.12 SRSF12, PNRC1
1 81,835,391 105,362,894 rs81287678 1.48 × 10−8 0.13 SLC14A2
3 117,911,196 118,765,898 rs81258584 1.64 × 10−7 0.11 PPM1G
5 67,981,416 68,326,348 rs80985094 9.93 × 10−8 0.14 CCND2
7 36,202,231 37,157,566 rs80828473 7.41 × 10−12 0.19 PPARD
HIND 25 1 216,980,027 242,984,908 rs80946156 5.21 × 10−8 0.13 RCL1
CONF 104 3 97,726,517 97,741,803 rs81303888 2.72 × 10−7 0.11 LRPPRC
3 117,911,196 117,911,196 2.42 × 10−7 0.11 BRE, ENSSSCG00000026465
5 67,518,456 69,897,370 rs81384722 2.29 × 10−8 0.15 ENSSSCT00000000782
6 74,354,607 84,927,021 rs81389032 1.84 × 10−10 0.17 ENSSSCT00000032147, ENSSSCT00000003913
7 21,053,530 37,812,119 rs80828473 6.28 × 10−11 0.18 PPARD
7 131,126,819 131,126,819 rs81397155 6.20 × 10−8 0.15 TDRD9, CEP170B
12 24,812,751 26,022,727 rs81312521 3.16 × 10−8 0.13 NGFR
12 46,857,615 47,352,945 rs81435770 2.09 × 10−7 0.11 PIPOX
Yorkshire
FRONT 2 7 52,843,780 52,860,434 rs80995679 1.27 × 10−6 0.09 CHRNB4, PSMA4
BACK 2 6 142,725,268 142,803,333 rs81305243 1.08 × 10−6 0.10 DAB1
HIND 57 1 92,766,049 101,369,745 5.66 × 10−8 0.12 RIPPLY2, SNAP91
1 198,725,106 205,843,789 rs80999532 1.41 × 10−9 0.15 TMX1, FRMD6
7 103,101,452 121,513,304 rs80894106 3.36 × 10−8 0.12 VRTN, SYNDIG1L
CONF 222 1 92,766,049 92,766,049 4.99 × 10−12 0.20 RIPPLY2, SNAP91
1 198,725,106 208,707,283 rs80783847 2.42 × 10−13 0.22 ENSSSCT00000005518
6 41,235,400 43,110,092 rs81395827 3.82 × 10−9 0.15 ZNF382
7 102,881,143 103,495,170 rs80894106 3.86 × 10−11 0.18 VRTN, SYNDIG1L
10 18,665,600 18,920,852 rs81309142 8.35 × 10−8 0.12 ENSSCG00000030502, ZBTB18
12 14,208,800 15,365,718 rs81440562 5.63 × 10−12 0.20 CD79B, GH1
18 10,626,879 14,885,152 rs81469271 4.39 × 10−9 0.15 ENSSCG000000288580
Duroc
FRONT 12 3 97,469,056 99,288,792 rs323557679 3.28 × 10−7 0.16 MSH2
6 47,212,157 57,685,509 rs81226413 4.22 × 10−8 0.18 ENSSCT00000003685
BACK 128 3 100,232,086 100,448,894 rs81373717 6.41 × 10−31 0.85 EPAS1, PRKCE
6 47,212,157 53,526,888 rs338147539 2.59 × 10−8 0.19 CCDC61
HIND 31 6 54,949,995 60,446,765 rs81327648 9.17 × 10−11 0.25 WRAP73
CONF 235 2 36,580,946 46,128,234 6.01 × 10−8 0.16 ANO3
3 97,469,056 100,477,666 rs81373756 6.44 × 10−20 0.54 PRKCE
4 99,503,615 111,556,304 rs81382406 3.88 × 10−8 0.17 CHRNB2
6 47,573,330 57,685,509 rs81333163 5.30 × 10−20 0.52 A1BG, RPS5
7 34,755,602 36,697,937 rs80852624 9.4 × 10−8 0.18 HMGA1, RPS10
7 103,495,170 103,495,170 rs80894106 8.60 × 10−11 0.25 VRTN, SYNDIG1L
12 25,298,982 25,580,071 rs327303574 3.80 × 10−11 0.26 ENSSCT00000022825, B4GALNT2
13 132,640,404 133,032,413 1.21 × 10−6 0.14 IGF2BP2

FRONT front leg quality, BACK back quality, HIND hind leg quality, CONF overall conformation, n number of significant SNPs, Chr Sus scrofa chromosome, Effect size percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the most significant SNP

a SNP rsID

b Candidate genes in which the most significant SNPs located are in italic