Table 5.
Linguistic evaluation of alternatives by each expert
Expert 1 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | ||||
C11 | C12 | C21 | C22 | C31 | C32 | C41 | C42 | |
A1 | VG | VG | F | G | VG | G | VG | G |
A2 | F | P | G | F | VG | P | F | F |
A3 | G | F | F | G | F | F | VG | F |
Expert 2 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | ||||
C11 | C12 | C21 | C22 | C31 | C32 | C41 | C42 | |
A1 | G | F | G | F | F | V | F | F |
A2 | VG | VG | VG | G | G | VG | VG | G |
A3 | F | G | P | F | G | F | F | G |
Expert 3 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | ||||
C11 | C12 | C21 | C22 | C31 | C32 | C41 | C42 | |
A1 | F | F | G | F | F | G | P | F |
A2 | G | G | VG | G | G | VG | F | G |
A3 | F | VG | F | F | F | F | P | F |