Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;12:367–381. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S119908

Table 5.

Results of random effect network meta-analysis for exacerbation rate

Comparators Interventions
IND 150 μg
IND 300 μg
Rate ratio (95% CrI) P-value
(better) %a
Rate ratio (95% CrI) P-value
(better) %a
PLBO 0.729 (0.607, 0.866) >99 0.817 (0.692, 0.959) >99
SAL 50 μg 0.895 (0.737, 1.089) 88 1.004 (0.834, 1.220) 52
FOR 12 μg 0.845 (0.657, 1.072) 93 0.945 (0.760, 1.159) 73
IND 150 μg N/A N/A 1.128 (0.909, 1.378) 13
IND 300 μg 0.897 (0.726, 1.100) 87 N/A N/A
OLO 5 μg 0.773 (0.590, 0.991) 98 0.865 (0.674, 1.094) 89
OLO 10 μg 0.737 (0.565, 0.939) >99 0.826 (0.645, 1.035) 96

Note:

a

P (better) denotes the probability that the intervention dose (column) is more effective than the comparator dose (row).

Abbreviations: 95% CrI, 95% credible interval; FOR, formoterol; IND, indacaterol; N/A, not applicable; OLO, olodaterol; PLBO, placebo; SAL, salmeterol.