Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 24;12(1):e0170371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170371

Table 1. Cervical cancer screening coverage at baseline, those referring a private gynecologist and rescued coverage post intervention and final population coverage attained by intervention groups and the control group at five and a half years*.

IG1 IG2 IG3 TOTAL IGs CONTROL
N % N % N % N % N %
TARGET POPULATION 8504 100 7842 100 10398 100 26744 100 4694 100
BASELINE COVERAGE 4771 56.1 4568 58.3 4939 47.5 14278 53.4 2615 55.7
STUDY TARGET POPULATION 4197 49.3 3601 45.9 6088 58.5 13886 51.9 2079 44.3
PRIVATE SCREENING 778 9.1 649 8.2 1435 13.8 2862 10.7 NK
RESCUED& 1578 18.6 1367 17.4 2396 23.0 5341 20.0 428 9.1
Increased coverage$ 27.8% 26.2% 37.3% 31.0% 9%
FINAL COVERAGE 7127 83.8 6584 84.0 8770 84.4 22481 84.1 3043 64.8
LOST TO FOLLOW UP 1377 16.1 1258 16.0 1628 15.7 4263 15.9 NK
P value heterogeneity test in final coverage & lost to follow up P = 0.5807 NA
P value heterogeneity test in rescue & target population P = 0.000 P = 0.000

NK = Unknown NA = Not applicable. All percentages are referred to the Target Population.

& = For control group attendance to screening was opportunistic.

$ = Weighted coverage by age structure of IGs.

*The table excludes 1420 women because of hysterectomy for benign reasons, changes of residence and death.