Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 24;12(1):e0170371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170371

Table 2. Cervical cancer screening coverage at baseline, those referring a private gynecologist and rescued coverage post intervention and final population coverage attained by intervention and age groups.

Age group
    <40           40–49         50–59         ≥60    
IG1 IG2 IG3 IG1 IG2 IG3 IG1 IG2 IG3 IG1 IG2 IG3
N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N %
TARGET POPULATION 3156 100 2775 100 3643 100 2376 100 2107 100 2705 100 1677 100 1824 100 2263 100 1295 100 1136 100 1787 100
BASELINE COVERAGE 1862 59.0 1647 59.4 1939 53.2 1343 56.5 1260 59.8 1204 44.5 977 58.3 1131 62.0 1158 51.2 589 45.5 530 46.7 638 35.7
STUDY TARGET 1294 41.0 1128 40.6 1704 46.8 1033 43.5 847 40.2 1501 55.5 700 41.7 693 38.0 1105 48.8 706 54.5 606 53.3 1149 64.3
RESCUED 449 14.2 392 14.1 576 15.8 512 21.5 381 18.1 665 24.6 314 18.7 318 17.4 584 25.8 303 23.4 276 24.3 571 32.0
PRIVATE SCREENING 415 13.1 266 9.6 625 17.2 172 7.2 164 7.78 451 16.7 89 5.3 104 5.7 173 7.6 102 7.9 115 10.1 186 10.4
LOST TO FOLLOW UP 430 41.0 470 16.9 503 13.8 349 14.7 302 14.3 385 14.2 297 17.7 271 14.9 348 15.4 301 23.2 215 18.9 392 21.9
FINAL COVERAGE 3002 95.1 2557 92.1 3551 97.5 1904 80.1 1717 81.5 2178 80.5 1389 82.8 1568 86.0 1903 84.1 832 64.2 742 65.3 1138 63.7
p-value heterogeneity IG1-IG2-IG3     0.554           0.029           0.001           0.001