Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):214–221. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001330

Table 3.

Suggested Questions from NIH K12 Program Directors, Current Scholars, and Former Scholars to Evaluate Team Mentoring, From a Study of the Advantages and Challenges to Team Mentoring, 2014

Type of question and source Questions
Outcomesa
  • Scholar needs and expectations versus degree to which team mentoring helped them achieve those

  • Opportunities for networking

  • Opportunities to attend and/or present at conferences related to the mentee’s field

  • Time to translate research into practice

  • Career development (e.g., scholar’s satisfaction, work/life balance, etc.)

  • Number of submitted and published manuscripts

  • Number of grants submitted, awarded

  • Number of manuscripts developed with the scholar’s mentorship team (as opposed to only one mentor)

Processa
  • Frequency of team mentoring meetings

  • Benefits of team mentoring

  • Challenges of team mentoring

  • Evaluation of make-up of mentoring team (e.g., number, discipline, personality mix, dedication to scholar)

  • Evaluation of what scholars hoped to get from mentoring process vs. what they received from mentoring process (e.g., skills they would like to learn)

  • Creation of clear, formalized guidelines for mentoring meetings

  • Management of competing advice, mentoring styles, expectations, etc.

  • Describe a few observations about team mentoring when it works/doesn’t work (consider career development, research design approach, grant writing, publications, networking, etc.).

  • List what about team mentoring had the greatest impact on the scholar’s success

Individual recommendations
 Program directors
  • Describe the types of discussions that are most or least helpful

  • Provide specific examples of the benefit accrued by team mentoring

  • Ask scholar if he/she would seek to keep this mentoring team in place beyond the BIRCWH funding period

  • Ask scholar if he/she would wish to recreate a different team of mentors

  • Ask scholar about the frequency of disagreements

 Current scholars
  • Describe how the team mentoring approach has impacted the scholar’s goals while a BIRCWH scholar

  • Ask scholar if he/she feels as if her mentors are adequately engaged individually and collectively in the scholar’s work and development

  • Ask scholar if the degree of mentoring which he/she receives through the team mentoring approach is sufficient for her development as a scholar

  • Ask scholar if he/she had the option between individual mentoring and team mentoring, which he/she would choose, and why

  • Ask scholar if he/she would have interdisciplinary team mentoring available to her without the BIRCWH program

 Former scholars
  • Ask scholar if he/she feels that her mentors know his/her very well

  • Ask scholar if he/she respects the advice his/her mentors are giving

  • Ask scholar if all mentors in his/her mentoring team/group are aware of each other’s input

Abbreviations: NIH indicates National Institutes of Health; BIRCWH, Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health program.

a

Recommended by all three groups: program directors, current scholars, former scholars.