Table 4.
HIV-negative | HIV-positive | |||
Analysis 2: by HIV status | Risk difference (%) | 95% confidence limits | Risk difference (%) | 95% confidence limits |
Crude | 15.0 | 4.9 to 25.1 | 30.0 | 21.9 to 38.2 |
Adjusteda | 9.7 | 0.0 to 19.4 | 19.2 | 10.9 to 27.5 |
Sensitivity analysesb | ||||
Adjusted, reduced modelb | 8.8 | −0.9 to 18.5 | 21.5 | 13.3 to 29.8 |
2.1 Subjects with smoking history | 14.2 | 3.0 to 25.4 | 24.0 | 14.1 to 33.9 |
2.2 Subjects with smoking history and control for previous pregnancy loss | 13.0 | 2.6 to 23.4 | 23.9 | 14.0 to 33.7 |
2.3 First pregnancy | 7.3 | −7.7 to 22.3 | 23.5 | 9.7 to 37.2 |
2.4 Pregnancies on or after … | ||||
1 January 1998 | 4.2 | −6.4 to 14.8 | 19.7 | 9.9 to 29.5 |
1 January 2002 | 5.5 | −6.4 to 17.4 | 23.7 | 12.6 to 34.8 |
2.5 Controlling for bacterial vaginosis | 8.0 | −1.5 to 17.5 | 19.2 | 11.0 to 27.3 |
2.6 By ART usec | ||||
Current ART | 20.4 | 10.4 to 30.5 | ||
No current ART | 17.5 | 1.9 to 33.1 | ||
2.7 By HAART usec | ||||
Current HAART | 24.0 | 13.0 to 35.1 | ||
No current HAART | 13.4 | 0.4 to 26.5 | ||
2.8 By viral suppression statusd | ||||
Suppressed | 22.5 | 11.1 to 33.9 | ||
Not suppressed | 13.4 | 0.6 to 26.3 |
All models account for repeated outcomes within women.
aFully adjusted models controlled for HIV status (including an interaction term with main exposure), age, socioeconomic status (employment, race, income), BMI, depression, recent use of intravenous drugs, marijuana, and alcohol. Modeling details given in text.
bSensitivity analyses relied on a reduced model for convergence. The main reduced adjusted model controlled for HIV status (including an interaction term with main exposure), depression, recent use of marijuana and alcohol.
cThis model did not control for viral load or CD4+ cell count, which are affected by ART/HAART use in the last six months.
dModel also controlled for use of HAART. Suppression was defined as a viral load <1000 copies/ml.