Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016 May 4;28(3):309–351. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1174718

Table 12.

Study quality ratings: high; moderate low (see Appendix 2 for a description of these rating categories).

Study Design Control for confounds Aphasia variables Assessment variables STM/WM score interpretation Overall rating
Abou El Ella et al. (2013) High Low Moderate Low High Low
Allen et al. (2012) High Low Low Low High Low
Butler et al. (2014) High Moderate High Low High Low
Caza et al. (2002) Low Low Moderate Low High Low
Chiou and Kennedy (2009) High Moderate High High High High
Coelho et al. (2005) High Low Moderate Low Low Low
Crescentini et al. (2008) Low Low Moderate Moderate High Low
DeDe et al. (2014) High Moderate High Moderate High Moderate
Fillingham et al. (2006) High Low High Low High Low
Francis et al. (2003) Low Low Low Low Low Low
Friedmann and Gvion (2007) Moderate Low Moderate Low High Low
Fucetola et al. (2006) High Low High High High Low
Fucetola et al. (2009) High High High High High High
Galling et al. (2014) Low Low Moderate Low Low Low
Gvion and Friedmann (2012) High Low Moderate Low High Low
Helm-Estabrooks (2002) High Moderate Low Low High Low
Hoffman et al. (2013) Moderate Low Moderate Low Low Low
Howard and Nickels (2005) Low Low Low Low High Low
Ivanova et al. (2015) High High High Moderate Low Low
Ivanova and Hallowell (2014) High High High Moderate High High
Kalbe et al. (2005) High Moderate High Moderate High Moderate
Kasselimis et al. (2013) High Moderate Low Low Low Low
Lang and Quitz (2012) High Moderate Low Moderate Low Low
Lee and Pyun (2014) High High Moderate Low Low Low
Lee and Sohlberg (2013) High Low Moderate Low Low Low
Mayer and Murray (2002) Moderate High Moderate Low High Low
Meteyard et al. (2015) Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate High Moderate
Murray (2012b) High High High Low High Low
Murray et al. (2006) Moderate Low Moderate Moderate High Low
Nicholas et al. (2005) High Low Moderate Low High Low
Sage et al. (2011) Moderate Low Low Low High Low
Salis (2012) Moderate Low Moderate Low High Low
Sidiropoulos et al. (2015) High Moderate Low Low High Low
Sinotte and Coelho (2007) Moderate Low Moderate Low High Low
Sung et al. (2009) High High Low Low Low Low
Vukovic et al. (2008) High Low Moderate Moderate Low Low