Skip to main content
. 2002 Jan 8;70(2):399–411. doi: 10.1086/338660

Table 7.

Results of the Analysis of the NIDDM1 Data Set[Note]

P Value for Our Test
MapOrder Locus AlleleFrequency No. ofFamilies LinkageP Value Unadjusted Adjusted (7.4×10-4)
1 SNP20 .85 153 3.57×10-5 .0001337 .0394
2 SNP66 .88 124 5.95×10-5 .0009932 .1048
3 SNP45 .94 163 1.58×10-5 .0001234 .0285
4 SNP44 .94 164 2.32×10-5 .0001009 .0376
5 SNP43a .73 160 2.01×10-5 .0000001 .0004
6 SNP79 .97 161 2.66×10-5 .0000244 .0247
7 SNP78 .94 162 2.03×10-5 .0000558 .0291
8 SNP77 .92 161 1.58×10-5 .0000522 .0228
9 SNP56 .57 149 4.40×10-5 .0001638 .0157
10 SNP19a .56 161 1.47×10-5 .0000347 .0042
11 SNP48 .55 154 1.64×10-5 .0000303 .0033
12 SNP62 .81 125 6.27×10-5 .0081385 .1174
13 SNP63a .76 130 3.50×10-5 .0001566 .0197
14 SNP26 .92 162 2.04×10-5 .0000356 .0137
15 SNP25 .50 156 4.07×10-5 .0000322 .0054
16 SNP24 .98 162 1.92×10-5 .0000053 .0201
17 SNP23 .85 158 1.67×10-5 .0000556 .0084
18 SNP22 .61 158 1.56×10-5 .0019207 .0253
19 SNP53 .90 155 6.80×10-5 .0000026 .0161
20 SNP38 .62 154 5.62×10-5 .0004898 .0196
21 SNP29 .77 151 1.48×10-5 .0001107 .0074
22 SNP28 .56 156 0.46×10-5 .0003044 .0057

Note.— The SNPs are listed in map order. The number of families (i.e., the number of sibships with at least two genotyped affected sibs) varies from SNP to SNP because of missing data for some SNPs in some families. The linkage P value is the P value for the ordinary allele-sharing test of linkage applied to the nonmissing families for that SNP. The unadjusted P value for our test is the P value for the test of H0: the given SNP is the sole cause of linkage, and the adjusted P value is conditional on detection of suggestive evidence for linkage.

a

SNPs implicated in the study by Horikawa et al. (2000).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure