Table 1. Quality of the tested cryopreservation protocols.
Pre-cryoViability | Post-cryoViability | RecoveryYield | Ability togenerate NS | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol-1 | N/D | 76,90 ± 2,4% | 71,44 ± 7,2% | +++ |
Protocol-2 | 90,51 ± 0,7% | 66,47 ± 12% | 59,32 ± 14,4% | - |
Protocol-3 | 91,65 ± 1,8% | 75,43 ± 5,8% | 34,36 ± 4,5% | + |
Protocol-4 | 89,14 ± 1,8% | 92,23 ± 7,3% | 29,60 ± 5,4% | - |
Cell survival was determined by tripan blue staining for each cryovial (n = 5). Data represented as mean ± SEM. After cell plating to form NS, the cultures were classified as: (-) not able to form NS; (+) slow formation of primary NS; (+++) fast and vigorous formation of primary and secondary NS. N/D; Not determined.