Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 27;49(1):193–203. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.473

Table 1.

Differences in OS and PFS according to the completeness of adjuvant TMZ treatment

Variable Total patients (n=750)
Methylated (n=89)
Unmethylated (n=128)
OS PFS OS PFS OS PFS
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
TMZ < 3 cycles n=93 n=9 n=17
 Median (mo) 10.2±1.0 5.3±0.2 10.1+5.5 4.6±1.1 9.5±1.1 5.4±0.9
 95% Cl (mo) 8.3-12.1 4.9-5.7 0-20.9 2.5-6.7 7.3-11.7 3.6-72
TMZ ≥ 3 cycles n=160 n=20 n=30
 Median (mo) 13.9±0.6 6.7±0.2 16.1±0.9 8.0±1.9 14.2±0.7 62±1.0
 95% Cl (mo) 12.8-15.0 62-7.2 14.3-17.9 4.3-11.7 12.9-15.5 4.2-82
Patients who completed 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ n=407 n=55 n=67
 Median (mo) 25.7±1.1 14.7±0.7 29.6±2.9 19.2±3.2 22.2±3.2 12.1±0.8
 95% Cl (mo) 23.6-27.8 13.3-16.1 23.9-35.3 13.0-25.4 16.0-28.4 10.6-13.6
Patients who did not receive adjuvant TMZ n=90 n=5 n=14
 Median (mo) 6.5±0.9 3.8±0.2 5.8±0.9 4.2 4.9±2.2 3.8±0.4
 95% Cl (mo) 4.6-8.4 3.4-4.2 4.1-7.5 - 0.7-9.1 3.0-4.6

Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests. OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TMZ, temozolomide; CI, confidence interval.