Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan-Mar;21(1):e2016.00092. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00092

Table 2.

Survey Responses

Item n (%)
Country 19 Missing
    USA 317 (64)
    Other 182 (36)
Q1. Age 78 Missing
    20–30 6 (1)
    31–40 74 (17)
    41–50 132 (30)
    51–60 147 (33)
    61+ 81 (18)
Q2. Level of training 6 Missing
    Attending 209 (41)
    Fellow 61 (12)
    Senior Attending (20+ years) 242 (47)
Q3. Use intracorporeal power morcellator 5 Missing
    No 313 (61)
    Yes 200 (39)
Q4. Reason for not using power morcellator 1 Missing
    Not comfortable 61 (20)
    Hospital does not keep in stock 53 (17)
    Hospital banned morcellator 149 (48)
    NA 49 (16)
Q5. Hospital have policy about morcellation 6 Missing
    DK 31 (6)
    No 207 (40)
    Yes 274 (54)
Q6. Heard about press concerning dissemination of occult uterine malignancy after morcellation 4 Missing
    No 19 (4)
    Yes 495 (96)
Q7. Will risk of disseminated disease make you stop using morcellator 6 Missing
    No 339 (66)
    Yes 173 (34)
Q8. Does morcellation of occult malignancy affect survival 7 Missing
    No 204 (40)
    Yes 307 (60)
Q9. Can morcellation disseminate benign pathology, including endometriosis and fibroids 4 Missing
    No 160 (31)
    Yes 354 (69)
Q10. Personally seen uterine sarcoma diagnosed not suspected pre-op 4 Missing
    No 268 (52)
    Yes 246 (48)
Q11. What percent of your cases are performed open, laparoscopic, robotic, or MIS with mini-incision for tissue extraction?
Open 41 Missing
    <10% 286 (60)
    10–25% 75 (16)
    25–49% 41 (9)
    50% 31 (6)
    51–75% 17 (3)
    75–90% 14 (3)
    >90% 13 (3)
Laparoscopic 30 Missing
    <10% 45 (9)
    10–25% 65 (13)
    25–49% 72 (15)
    50% 53 (11)
    51–75% 67 (14)
    75–90% 89 (18)
    >90% 97 (20)
Robotic 141 Missing
    <10% 195 (51)
    10–25% 33 (9)
    25–49% 44 (12)
    50% 12 (3)
    51–75% 34 (9)
    75–90% 30 (8)
    >90% 29 (8)