Table 3.
Linear Lagged Connectivity (LLC) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | AUROC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intra-hemispheric left parietal limbic | 70 | 74 | 71.8 | 0.74 |
Intra-hemispheric left occipital limbic | 73.3 | 64 | 69.1 | 0.71 |
Intra-hemispheric right temporal limbic | 79.2 | 55 | 68.2 | 0.71 |
Intra-hemispheric right central occipital | 80.8 | 54 | 68.6 | 0.70 |
Intra-hemispheric right parietal occipital | 71.7 | 72 | 71.8 | 0.73 |
Intra-hemispheric right parietal temporal | 67.5 | 71 | 69.1 | 0.71 |
Intra-hemispheric right parietal limbic | 68.3 | 71 | 69.5 | 0.72 |
Intra-hemispheric right occipital temporal | 70.8 | 72 | 71.3 | 0.74 |
Intra-hemispheric right occipital limbic | 66.7 | 76 | 70.9 | 0.73 |
Intra-hemispheric right temporal limbic | 76.7 | 64 | 70.9 | 0.73 |
Specifically, those composite EEG markers were obtained by computing the ratio between the theta lagged linear connectivity and the alpha 1 linear lagged connectivity, exept the intra-hemispheric right temporal limbic linear lagget connectivity, computed with the ratio between the delta lagged linear connectivity and the alpha 1 linear lagged connectivity. The classification rate is computed by the analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The table reports the classification indexes for the composite EEG markers having an AUROC higher than 0.70 (i.e., 70%).