Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;10:604. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00604

Table 3.

Results of the classification between single AD and Nold subjects based on composite EEG markers of lagged linear connectivity.

Linear Lagged Connectivity (LLC) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) AUROC
Intra-hemispheric left parietal limbic 70 74 71.8 0.74
Intra-hemispheric left occipital limbic 73.3 64 69.1 0.71
Intra-hemispheric right temporal limbic 79.2 55 68.2 0.71
Intra-hemispheric right central occipital 80.8 54 68.6 0.70
Intra-hemispheric right parietal occipital 71.7 72 71.8 0.73
Intra-hemispheric right parietal temporal 67.5 71 69.1 0.71
Intra-hemispheric right parietal limbic 68.3 71 69.5 0.72
Intra-hemispheric right occipital temporal 70.8 72 71.3 0.74
Intra-hemispheric right occipital limbic 66.7 76 70.9 0.73
Intra-hemispheric right temporal limbic 76.7 64 70.9 0.73

Specifically, those composite EEG markers were obtained by computing the ratio between the theta lagged linear connectivity and the alpha 1 linear lagged connectivity, exept the intra-hemispheric right temporal limbic linear lagget connectivity, computed with the ratio between the delta lagged linear connectivity and the alpha 1 linear lagged connectivity. The classification rate is computed by the analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The table reports the classification indexes for the composite EEG markers having an AUROC higher than 0.70 (i.e., 70%).