TABLE 3.
Pearson correlations between model parameters at baseline and model parameters for the reduced-rate and combined-rate interventions1
| Baseline |
|||
| θ | Emax | r | |
| Baseline | |||
| θ | 1 | 0.730 | −0.715 |
| Emax | 0.730 | 1 | −0.857 |
| r | −0.715 | −0.857 | 1 |
| Reduced rate | |||
| θ | 0.502 | 0.425 | −0.343 |
| r | −0.438 | −0.329 | 0.300 |
| Emax | 0.353 | 0.286 | −0.192 |
| Combined rate | |||
| θ | 0.533 | 0.465 | −0.328 |
| r | −0.507 | −0.511 | 0.453 |
| Emax | 0.359 | 0.457 | −0.318 |
1
All Pearson correlations were significant, indicating that the individual parameters capture the dynamic eating behavior changes implemented by reducing the eating rates. Emax, maximal food intake; r, eating duration; θ, nonzero initial eating rate.