Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;49:13. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0286-5

Table 5.

Comparison of the TWICE_SEQ and MERGE sets for 21 twice-sequenced individuals

Animal ID MERGE OVERLAP SHARE Overlap% Coverage
HOLFRAM268 845 27 15 55.56 21.32
HOLFRAM266 1896 1635 1041 63.67 14.25
HOLNLDM273 1796 1913 1176 65.48 15.34
HOLNLDM270 1677 2069 1136 67.74 15.51
HOLDNKM259 1682 2001 1146 68.13 15.74
HOLUSAM277 2219 2398 1524 68.68 17.62
HOLNLDM272 2039 2520 1410 69.15 16.91
HOLDEUM255 1881 2168 1341 71.29 17.02
HOLUSAM280 2000 2200 1440 72.00 17.55
HOLNLDM274 690 1585 497 72.03 14.78
HOLDNKM262 980 2537 714 72.86 17.4
HOLDNKM261 1969 1867 1361 72.90 15.84
HOLUSAM278 1011 3067 761 75.27 18.96
HOLDNKM260 2557 1305 986 75.56 16.93
HOLDEUM256 1059 2730 806 76.11 17.48
HOLSWEM275 1214 2882 926 76.28 18.86
HOLUSAM279 1331 2581 1036 77.84 16.75
HOLDNKM263 1159 2697 916 79.03 17.02
HOLDEUM257 1356 3626 1087 80.16 21.53
HOLCANM253 1600 257 255 99.22 42.71
HOLUSAM276 845 132 131 99.24 16.89

MERGE and OVERLAP represent the counts of SV that were observed by using the merge and overlap method, respectively. SHARE represents the counts of SV that were found by both methods. The overlap percentage is equal to SHARE counts divided by the smaller number found in the merge and overlap method. Coverage is the sum of the coverages for each twice-sequenced individual