Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(1):280–292. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0004

Table 1.

Raw data, the percentages, and the p values for the four surrogate markers of care.

Appointment Show Rate by Clinic Number of Appointments Attended/Scheduled Percent Show Rate p value
Birmingham 354/592 59.8%
Montgomery 281/487 57.7%
Opelika 125/171 73.1%
Tuscaloosa 64/91 70.3%
Huntsville 41/69 59.4%
Combined Satellite Data 511/818 62.5% .0019
Hydroxyurea Use by Clinic Number of Patients on HU Percent of Patients on HU p value
Birmingham 132/594 22.2%
Montgomery 72/334 21.6%
Opelika 33/103 32.0%
Tuscaloosa 22/90 24.4%
Huntsville 15/70 21.4%
Combined Satellite Data 142/597 23.8% .2673
MRI Screening by Clinic Number of MRIs Completed Percent MRI Completed p value
Birmingham 28/44 63.6%
Montgomery 22/33 66.7%
Opelika 15/18 83.3%
Tuscaloosa 10/15 66.7%
Huntsville 8/16 50.0%
Combined Satellite Data 55/82 67.1% .3351
TCD Screening by Clinic Number of TCDs Completed Percent TCD Completed p value
Birmingham 54/66 75.8%
Montgomery 42/49 81.6%
Opelika 17/18 94.4%
Tuscaloosa 19/22 86.4%
Huntsville 5/6 83.3%
Combined Satellite Data 83/95 87.4% .707

The p values compare the combined satellite data to the Birmingham clinic data.