Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Nov 21;18(12):1281–1291. doi: 10.1038/ncb3442

Crumbs2 Promotes Cell Ingression During the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition at Gastrulation

Nitya Ramkumar 1,2, Tatiana Omelchenko 3, Nancy F Silva-Gagliardi 4, C Jane McGlade 4, Jan Wijnholds 5, Kathryn V Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC5268168  NIHMSID: NIHMS842486  PMID: 27870829

Abstract

During gastrulation of the mouse embryo, individual cells ingress in an apparently stochastic pattern during the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Here we define a critical role of the apical protein Crumbs2 (CRB2) in the gastrulation EMT. Static and live imaging show that ingressing cells in Crumbs2 mutant embryos become trapped at the primitive streak, where they continue to express the epiblast transcription factor SOX2 and retain thin E-cadherin-containing connections to the epiblast surface that trap them at the streak. CRB2 is distributed in a complex anisotropic pattern on apical cell edges, and the level of CRB2 on a cell edge is inversely correlated with the level of Myosin IIB. The data suggest that the distributions of CRB2 and Myosin IIB define which cells will ingress and we propose that cells with high apical CRB2 are basally extruded from the epiblast by neighboring cells with high levels of apical myosin.


An epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) during gastrulation establishes the three layers of the animal body plan (ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm) through a defined sequence of morphological transformations1,2,3,4. Defects in the gastrulation EMT and in subsequent mesoderm migration are a significant cause of human birth defects5. EMTs are also required for formation of many organs and are associated with tumor progression6,7.

Gastrulation of amniotes (e.g. birds and mammals) requires a sequence of coordinated cellular events. The gastrulation EMT begins with the breakdown of the basement membrane underlying the epithelial epiblast at a single position, the primitive streak, which marks the future posterior pole of the body plan. Basement membrane breakdown is rapidly followed by apical constriction and a basal shift of the nucleus of an ingressing epiblast cell, followed by dissolution of apical tight and adherens junctions, and, finally, acquisition of a migratory program in cells of the nascent mesoderm and definitive endoderm. This EMT is triggered by a convergence of secreted signals (Wnt, Nodal, FGF, BMP)8 and is coupled to changes in transcription factor expression, including loss of expression of the pluripotency-associated factor SOX2 and upregulation of the mesenchymal factor SNAIL19.

The amniote primitive streak is a dynamic cell population: as cells leave the primitive streak epithelium to populate the mesoderm, they are continuously replaced by cells from the adjacent epiblast epithelium. It is not known how the stable morphology of the primitive streak is maintained despite this continuous flux4. Cells at the chick or mouse primitive streak exit from the epiblast epithelium as individuals, while the adjacent cells of the epiblast retain their apical junctions3,4. Thus amniote gastrulation, like collective cell migration, requires dynamic neighbor exchanges while simultaneously maintaining the integrity of the epithelium.

Here we show that mouse Crumbs2 (CRB2) promotes cell ingression during gastrulation. In contrast to the best-defined role of Drosophila Crumbs protein as a determinant of the apical domain of epithelial cells10,11, epithelial polarity is normal in the epiblast of Crumbs2 mutants, but cells of the late (>E7.5) primitive streak fail to delaminate and remain tethered to the apical surface of the epiblast epithelium by thin E-cadherin-containing connections. Thus mouse CRB2 is required to remove, rather than maintain, apical junctions. We also find that CRB2 is localized in a complex anisotropic pattern in cells of the epiblast. Localized CRB2 accumulation is inversely correlated with the level of apical Myosin IIB, consistent with the hypothesis that CRB2 is an essential component of a system that directs stochastic actomyosin-dependent cell ingression during gastrulation.

Results

CRB2 is required for normal mesoderm production

Mammals have three members of the Crumbs family. Mutations in human or mouse Crumbs1 cause light-dependent retinal degeneration but do not affect viability12. Mice lacking Crumbs3 survive to birth with defects in lung and intestinal epithelia13. Mouse Crumbs2 mutants initiate post-implantation development normally but arrest at mid-gestation (~E9.0) with a syndrome of morphological defects, including a deficit of mesoderm and an abnormal neural plate14,15. Both Crumbs2 RNA and protein are expressed in the epiblast, but not the endoderm or mesoderm layers, of the E6.75 and E7.5 embryo (Supplementary Fig. 1).

To test whether CRB2 overlaps in function with other Crumbs family proteins, we analyzed the phenotypes of double and triple mutant embryos. Crumbs2−/− Crumbs3−/− and Crumbs1rd8/rd8 Crumbs2−/− double mutant embryos and Crumbs1rd8/rd8 Crumbs2−/− Crumbs3−/− triple mutant embryos all expressed the primitive streak marker Brachyury (T) in the normal posterior domain at E7.5, had reduced paraxial mesoderm, marked by Meox1 expression, and an abnormal neural plate at E8.5 (Fig. 1A, B), indicating that only CRB2 has a critical role in the early embryo.

Figure 1. Crumbs2 is required for mammalian gastrulation.

Figure 1

(A) In situ hybridization for Meox1 expression in wild type, Crumbs2 mutant, Crumbs2 Crumbs3 and Crumbs1rd8 Crumbs2 double mutants at E8.5. The double mutants have the same reduction in paraxial mesoderm seen in Crumbs2 mutants, n ≥ 4 embryos for each genotype. (B) Wild type, Crumbs2 mutants and Crumbs triple mutants (Crumbs1rd8, Crumbs2−/−, Crumbs3−/−) at E7.5 probed for expression of Brachyury, a marker of the primitive streak, n ≥ 3 embryos for each genotype. The extraembryonic portion of the triple mutant was removed for genotyping (C) Transverse sections through the epiblast of E7.75 wild type and Crumbs2−/− Crumbs3−/− double mutant embryos immunostained for ZO1 and pERM, aPKCλ and Par3 and γ-tubulin and ARL13b, n=3 double mutant embryos (3–4 sections per embryo). The double mutants do not have defects in apical-basal polarity of the epiblast. Single optical sections of transverse sections through the primitive streak at E7.5 (D, E) and E8.0 (F) of WT (D, E), Crumbs2 (D, E, F) and Poglut1wsnp (F) immunostained for Brachyury (T) and Laminin (D), SNAIL1 and SOX2 (E, F), n ≥ 5 mutant embryos per genotype. Posterior to the right; bars indicate width of primitive streak. At E7.5, a few cells expressing SOX2 accumulate at the streak (line in E). At this stage, the SNAIL1+ mesoderm layer is 2–3 cells thick in wild type, and 1–2 cells thick in the mutant. By E8.0, many SOX2+ cells, and scattered SNAIL1+ cells, have accumulated in the Crumbs2 and Poglut1wsnp primitive streak region (F). (A) Dorsal view, anterior up, (B) Lateral view, anterior to left, distal down. (C) Apical is up. Scale bars in A and B, 50μm; C–F, 21μm. The images shown here are representative and are of the mutant and wild type from the same experiment.

Although Crumbs is required for establishment of the apical domain of epithelia in the Drosophila embryo, markers of apical-basal polarity were correctly localized in the epiblast of E7.75 Crumbs2−/− mutant and the Crumbs2−/− Crumbs3−/− double mutant embryos. ZO1, a component of tight junctions, pERM, an apical membrane marker, and the Par complex proteins aPKCλ and Par3 were apically localized in wild type and mutants (Fig. 1C). γ-tubulin+ centrosomes were apical and Arl13b+ cilia extended from the apical surface of cells of the E7.5 Crumbs2−/− Crumbs3−/− epiblast (Fig. 1C).

CRB2 promotes cell ingression

The primitive streak of the mouse embryo, marked by the expression of the transcription factor Brachyury (T), is the region of the posterior epiblast where cells delaminate from the epithelium to form the mesoderm and definitive endoderm germ layers. At the early bud stage (E7.5), one day after the initiation of gastrulation, the primitive streak regions of wild-type and Crumbs2−/− mutant embryos were similar in morphology (Fig. 1D). At this stage, cells of the wild-type epiblast epithelium expressed SOX2 and cells in the mesoderm layer expressed SNAIL1 (Fig. 1E). In E7.5 Crumbs2−/− mutants, the width of the streak, as defined by the size of the break in the basement membrane, was comparable to the wild type and a thin SNAIL1+ mesoderm layer was present (Fig. 1E).

Twelve hours later, at E8.0, the primitive streak of the Crumbs2−/− mutant was dramatically engorged with cells. At this stage, many layers of SOX2-positive cells had accumulated at the primitive streak (Fig. 1F). At E8.0, the region of laminin breakdown at the mutant streak was wider than in wild type and cells expressing E-cadherin had accumulated at the streak (Supplementary Fig. 2A). Indistinguishable defects were seen in Poglut1wsnp embryos (Fig. 1F), which lack CRB2 activity due to an independent genetic lesion: POGLUT1 is required for the glycosylation of extracellular EGF repeats, which is required for cell surface localization of CRB2 [ref. 15]. In contrast, mutants with blocked mesoderm migration, such as Rac1, accumulate SNAIL1-positive cells near the streak (Supplementary Fig. 2B).

Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of E7.75 wild-type embryos showed that some epiblast cells at the streak had basally-displaced nuclei and cell protrusions, suggesting that they were acquiring mesodermal characteristics (Fig. 2A, A′). In SEMs of E7.75 Crumbs2−/− mutant embryos, some nuclei in the streak region were far from the epiblast surface but the cells remained attached to the apical surface of the epiblast by thin projections (Fig. 2B, B′). Similar defects were seen in cells at the Poglut1wsnp streak (Fig. 2C, C′).

Figure 2. Crumbs2 promotes cell ingression at the primitive streak.

Figure 2

(A–C) Scanning electron microscope views of the primitive streak in fractured wild-type (A, A′), Crumbs2 (B, B′) and Poglut1wsnp (C,C′) embryos at E7.75, n ≥ 6 embryos per genotype; posterior to the right. A′, B′ and C′ are higher magnification of the boxed regions in A, B and C respectively. Arrows point to long constricted apical segments of primitive streak cells in the mutants. (D–F) Single optical section from 3-D reconstruction of transverse sections through the primitive streak immunostained for E-cadherin (red) of wild type (D), Crumbs2 (E) and Poglut1wsnp (F) embryos expressing X-linked GFP in a mosaic manner, n ≥ 5 X-GFP positive embryos per genotype. Arrows show thin E-cadherin-positive cytoplasmic connections to the apical surface of cells, with the cell base (nuclei) far from the epiblast surface. (G–H) 3-D reconstructions of individual GFP-expressing single cells from the primitive streak of wild-type (G) and Crumbs2 mutants (H) carrying the X-GFP transgene, showing the elongated cytoplasmic threads that connect ingressing mutant cells to the apical surface of the epiblast (apical to the left), n ≥ 5 X-GFP positive embryos per genotype. Scale bar (A–C′ and G–H),10 μm; D–F, 25 μm. The images shown here represent the mutant and wild type from the same experiment.

To visualize the shapes of individual cells, we labeled individual cells with an X-linked GFP transgene that expresses cytoplasmic GFP in a mosaic manner as a result of random X-inactivation in female embryos16. Some apically constricted cells at the wild-type primitive streak had cell bodies displaced from the apical surface of the epiblast (Fig. 2D, G). In Crumbs2−/− and Poglut1wsnp mutant embryos, cell bodies far from the apical surface remained attached to the apical surface of the epiblast (Fig. 2E, F, H). The thin cytoplasmic connections to the apical surface of delaminating Crumbs2−/− and Poglut1wsnp streak cells were E-cadherin-positive (Fig. 2E, F), indicating that these cells had failed to dissolve their apical adherens junctions, a necessary step in the EMT. We infer that the SOX2+, E-cadherin+ cells that accumulated at the mutant streak remained integrated within the epiblast epithelium, and were therefore arrested in the midst of the EMT.

Live imaging defines cell ingression dynamics

To compare the dynamics of cell ingression of wild-type and mutant streak cells, we labeled individual cells by mosaic activation of GFP expression using the EIIA-Cre, mT/mG system3 and followed cell behavior in E7.5 cultured embryos by live confocal imaging. In the wild-type embryo, ingressing cells were apically constricted and had basal protrusions; they displaced their cell bodies basally and exited the epithelium in less than 2 hours (30–110 min; n=5 cells) (Supplementary Videos 1–3; Fig. 3A, D). In Crumbs2−/− mutants, cells at the streak constricted their apical membrane as the cell body moved basally, but they failed to leave the epithelium in the duration of imaging (>200 minutes; n=5 cells) (Supplementary Videos 4–6; Fig. 3B, D), leading to an accumulation of bottle-shaped cells with long thin apical extensions at the streak (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3. Live imaging defines defects in cell ingression in Crumbs2 mutants.

Figure 3

Individual cells delaminating at the primitive streak (highlighted yellow) in snapshots from time-lapse imaging of wild-type (A) and Crumbs2 (B) mutant embryos with mosaically labeled cells using the mT/mG system. Apical is up in these transverse optical sections. In wild-type embryos (A), the cell constricts its apical membrane and detaches its apical connection to delaminate from the epithelium in less than 2 hours (arrows showing loss of apical connection/retraction tail). In Crumbs2 mutants (B), the cell constricts its apical membrane and sends out basal protrusions but fails to leave the epithelium. Time interval: 10 minutes. Apical side of the epithelium is up. (C) Quantitative analysis of cell shape at the streak in wild-type and Crumbs2 mutant embryos. Membrane GFP-expressing cells were depicted manually for cell surface rendering and ellipticity was plotted for wild-type and Crumbs2 mutant streak cells to compare cell shape. Wild-type cells at the streak were predominantly oblate ellipsoids (flattened spheroids); long axes parallel to the epiblast surface (e = 0.34 ± 0.01 (mean ± SEM), n=102 structures from 9 cells, 4 independent experiments), whereas mutant cells were prolate ellipsoids (cigar-shaped) with long axes perpendicular to the epiblast surface (e = 0.17 ± 0.01 (mean ± SEM), n=169 structures from 13 cells, 3 independent experiments) (unpaired t-test: p < 0.0001). (D) Ingression dynamics of streak cells. The apical surface area was determined from optical confocal sections of GFP-labeled cells from time-lapse images at the apical surface of streak cells. The apical surface of wild-type cells reduced over time, whereas the mutant cells stuck at the streak have a constant small apical surface area. Pink bar marks the onset of ingression in wild type. Scale bars A, B,10 μm.

Autonomous and non-autonomous CRB2 activities

Consistent with the epiblast-specific expression of CRB2 (Supplementary Fig. 1), deletion of a conditional Crumbs2 allele in epiblast-derived cells using the Sox2-Cre transgene17 reproduced the deficit of paraxial and axial mesoderm seen in the null mutants (Supplementary Fig. 3), which demonstrated that CRB2 is required in embryonic rather than extraembryonic lineages. The Brachyury (T)-Cre becomes active in cells of the mid-to-late streak stage primitive streak (E7.5)18. Conditional deletion of Crumbs2 with T-Cre allowed formation of somewhat more mesoderm than in Crumbs2 null mutants (Fig 4A), but recapitulated most aspects of the null phenotype: paraxial mesoderm was reduced and SOX2+ mutant cells accumulated in the late primitive streak (Fig 4B). Thus Crumbs2 is required specifically in the cells of the primitive streak for cell ingression and efficient production of mesoderm.

Figure 4. Streak-autonomous and non-cell autonomous activities of Crumbs2.

Figure 4

(A) Meox1 expression at E8.5 shows the reduction in paraxial mesoderm in embryos with conditional deletion of Crumbs2 in cells of the primitive streak using T-Cre, compared to WT, n = 3 embryos per genotype. (B) Single optical section of transverse sections through the primitive streak region of WT and T-CRE, Crumbs2flox/Crumbs2 embryos at E8.5 immunostained for SNAIL1 and SOX2, n = 3 embryos per genotype (2–3 sections per embryo). Conditional deletion of Crumbs2 with T-Cre leads to accumulation of SOX2+ cells at the primitive streak similar to Crumbs2 null mutants. (C) Schematic showing the generation of mouse chimeras with Crumbs2−/− mutant cells labeled with GPI-GFP. (D–E) Contribution of Crumbs2−/− cells to normal tissues in chimeras. Transverse cryosection (D) and single optical section of whole mount immunostaining (E) through chimeric embryos with moderate contribution of Crumbs2 mutant cells (green) stained with phalloidin (red) showing the contribution of mutant cells to neural epithelium and otic vesicle (D) and somites (E) (F) En face view of the streak epithelium of chimeric embryos at E8.5 immunostained for Crumbs2 (red) and phalloidin (white-F′′′). Mutant cells are GFP positive. Arrows point to the absence of CRB2 expression in wild-type cells at the edges shared with mutant cells, whereas phalloidin expression was maintained at these edges. Asterisk highlights an exceptional cell at the streak that retains CRB2 despite being adjacent to Crumbs2 mutant cells. Scale bars A, 150 μm; B, D, E, 40 μm; F,10 μm. The images shown here are representative and show the mutant and wild type from the same experiment. (D–F) n=10 chimeric embryos were analyzed by cross section for contribution to different tissues and n=10 chimeric embryos were used for immunostaining and enface visualization of proteins (n=5 chimeric embryos for Crb2, Phalloidin and n=5 chimeric embryos for Crb2, β-catenin).

To examine cell autonomy at high resolution, we generated chimeric embryos using Crumbs2 mutant that expressed the membrane marker GPI-GFP19 (see Methods). After injection of GFP+ Crumbs2−/− ES cells into wild-type blastocysts, chimeric embryos were analyzed at E8.5 (Fig. 4C). High percentage chimeras (95–100% mutant cells; n=9) recapitulated the Crumbs2−/− phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 4B). In chimeric embryos with a lower contribution of mutant cells (10–40%; n=20), the overall morphology of the embryos appeared normal (Supplementary Fig. 4A) and mutant cells were incorporated into normal-appearing epithelia (Fig. 4D, E). Although Crumbs2−/− embryos did not form clear somites, Crumbs2 mutant cells were incorporated into somites in chimeric embryos (Fig. 4E), indicating that they had undergone both the primitive streak EMT and the mesodermal-to-epithelial transition (MET) that produces the somites.

In chimeric embryos, CRB2 was not detected on most of the edges of wild-type cells adjacent to mutant cells (GFP+) at the streak (Fig. 4F–F′′) and in the neural epithelium (Supplementary Fig 4C). In the same cells, actin (Fig. 4F, 4F′′′) and β-catenin (Supplementary Fig 4C) localized normally at boundaries between wild-type and mutant cells, suggesting that stability of membrane CRB2 may depend on homophilic interactions with adjacent cells, as seen in Drosophila and zebrafish20,21,22.

Complex spatial distribution of CRB2

CRB2 was enriched apically in the E6.75 and E7.75 epiblast (Fig. 5A, B; Supplementary Fig. 1D). At the early headfold stage (E7.75), there was a posterior-to-anterior gradient of apical CRB2, with approximately 4-fold higher levels near the streak than in the anterior epiblast (Fig 5B, B′). The posterior enrichment suggested that CRB2 has an instructive, rather than permissive, role in behavior of cells at the primitive streak.

Figure 5. CRB2 enrichment at the primitive streak.

Figure 5

(A, B) Double staining of CRB2 and phalloidin at early primitive streak stages, posterior to the right. (A, A′) At E6.75, CRB2 is enriched in the posterior epiblast, including the region of the primitive streak. Posterior epiblast from A is magnified in A′. (B, B′). At E7.75 CRB2 is expressed in both the anterior presumptive neural epithelium and the epiblast and is enriched in the posterior epiblast. (B′) Higher magnification of streak region. (C, C′) En face view of the apical surface of E8.5 posterior epiblast cells; proximal is up. Extended projection view of the same region of the primitive streak stained for ZO1(C) and CRB2 (D). ZO1 is expressed at uniform levels on all cell edges, whereas the level of expression of CRB2 is highly variable between cells and at different edges of the same cell. Neither Crumbs2 RNA nor CRB2 protein was detected in the wild-type endoderm or mesoderm (Fig. 5A, A′; Supplementary Fig. 1). (E, E′) 3D reconstruction from whole mount immunostaining for CRB2 in wild-type E8.0 embryos that express the X-linked GFP transgene, highlight the shape of individual cells. Apically constricted cells have high levels of apical CRB2. (F–G′) 3D reconstruction from whole mount immunostaining for SNAIL1 in wild type X-GFP embryos at E8.0. SNAIL1 is detectable in the basal nuclei of apically constricted cells in the epiblast layer of the wild-type streak. Black bar indicates the position of the streak. Cells of the wild-type mesoderm layer (bottom) are strongly Snail1+ (red), whereas some apically constricted GFP+ cells of the epiblast layer (top) have detectable levels of Snail1 in their basally-positioned nuclei (rightward arrows). Note the thin GFP+ cytoplasmic connection to the apical surface of the Snail+ cell in (F) (leftward arrow). Scale bars A, B, 100 μm; C–G′, 10 μm. Each immunostaining experiment contained at least 5–6 wild type embryos with and without X-GFP each. The images shown here are representative. This staining was repeated a minimum of three independent times to ensure reproducibility.

En face imaging of the apical surface of the epiblast showed that the surface area of epiblast cells was variable, although the tight junction protein ZO1 was expressed at similar levels on all edges of epiblast cells (Fig. 5C). In contrast, CRB2 was localized in complex anisotropic patterns (Fig. 5D). The anisotropic distribution was apparent in both the epiblast layer of the streak and in the adjacent epiblast (Supplementary Fig. 5); the highest CRB2 levels were >50-fold higher than the lowest levels. The distribution of edges with high CRB2 was, in part, correlated with cell topology: nearly half of triangular cells had high CRB2 on all edges, whereas only 10–15% of cells with 5 or 6 sides had CRB2 on all edges (Supplementary Fig. 5).

PATJ (INADL), a member of the Crumbs complex23 was also distributed anisotropically in the epiblast (Supplementary Fig. 6A), providing independent confirmation of the anisotropic localization of the Crumbs complex. Apical PATJ could not be detected in the primitive streak region of Crumbs2−/− or Poglut1wsnp embryos (Supplementary Fig 6B), consistent with a requirement of CRB2 for PATJ localization in the early mouse embryo.

In addition to the global anisotropic distribution of CRB2, there was strong punctate CRB2 staining in the region of the primitive streak (Fig. 5D, E). Transverse sections of embryos in which individual cells expressed the X-linked GFP transgene showed that the strong CRB2 puncta corresponded to the apical membranes of highly constricted primitive streak cells (Fig. 5E, E′), suggesting that apically constricted cells that are poised to delaminate have high levels of apical CRB2. The basally-positioned nuclei of these apically constricted cells had low but detectable levels of SNAIL1 (Fig 5F–G′), suggesting that SNAIL1 accumulation begins at the time of apical constriction.

CRB2 and Myosin IIB on opposing cell edges

In Drosophila, cell edges enriched with Crumbs can direct Myosin II cable formation at other cell edges20, and Myosin II (non-muscle myosin heavy chain II-B) has an important role in amniote gastrulation24. When viewed en face, Myosin IIB was present on most apical edges of wild-type E8.0 epiblast cells, but the intensity of expression was variable. In double labeling experiments, the levels of Myosin IIB and CRB2 on cell edges were inversely correlated: cell edges with high levels of CRB2 had lower levels of Myosin IIB, whereas cell edges with thicker myosin cables tended to have low levels of CRB2 (Fig. 6A–C). The reciprocal enrichment of CRB2 and Myosin IIB was also apparent in E7.0 early bud streak regions (Supplementary Fig. 6C) and in the epiblast adjacent to the streak at E8.5 (Supplementary Fig. 6D). The overall level of apical Myosin IIB assayed by immunofluorescence was ~2-fold lower in the mutants than in wild-type embryos (Fig. 6D, E), indicating that CRB2 promotes the apical enrichment of Myosin IIB.

Figure 6. CRB2 regulates the distribution of Myosin IIB.

Figure 6

(A) En face view of the apical surface of the epiblast layer of the primitive streak at E8.0, showing the reciprocal enrichment of CRB2 and Myosin IIB on different cell edges; proximal is up. (A) Single optical section of whole mount immunostaining for CRB2 (red) and Myosin IIB (green). (B) Magnification of boxed region in A, with single channels for CRB2 and Myosin. (C) Quantification of Myosin IIB and CRB2 en face localization at cell edges at the primitive streak (see Methods). Cell edges with high CRB have low levels of Myosin IIB (normalized intensity of Myosin IIB at high Myosin edges = 1.48 (n=349 cell edges) and normalized intensity of Myosin IIB at high CRB2 edges = 0.6 (n=436 cell edges); two tailed student t-test, p<0.00001, n=5 wild-type embryos). Edges with high Myosin IIB have low levels of CRB2 (normalized intensity of CRB2 at high Myosin edges = 0.57 (n=349 cell edges) and normalized intensity of CRB2 at high CRB2 edges = 1.36 (n=436 cell edges); two tailed student t-test, p <0.00001. The box represents the 25th–75th percentile, whiskers indicate 1.5 times the range, dots are the outliers and bar in the middle is median. (D–E) Myosin IIB along the cell edges is reduced in Crumbs2 mutants. (D) Extended projection view of the primitive streak of embryos whole mount stained for Myosin IIB and phalloidin at E8.0 showing lower levels on Myosin IIB on the cell edges in Crumbs2 compared to wild-type embryos. (E) Quantification of relative staining intensity shows that the total level of Myosin IIB on cell edges is ~2 fold higher in wild type than in Crb2 mutants (WT mean myosin intensity: 17.25×103, n=570 edges, 4 wild-type embryos; mutant mean myosin intensity: 9.32×103; n= 570 edges, 3 mutant embryos, two tailed student t-test, p <0.00001). The box represents the 25th–75th percentile, whiskers indicate 1.5 times the range, dots are the outliers and bar in the middle is median. Scale bars A and B, 10 μm; D, 20 μm. (F) Model for actions of CRB2. CRB2 controls E-cadherin down-regulation by promoting the SOX2-to-SNAIL1 switch, and controls Myosin IIB accumulation through a second pathway, perhaps through aPKC and Rho kinase. The complex anisotropic patterns of CRB2 and Myosin IIB are regulated in part by self-organizing regulatory mechanisms. The images shown represent the mutant and wild type from the same experiment.

The abnormal EMT disrupts the epiblast basement membrane

In older (E8.5) Crumbs2 and Poglut1wsnp mutants, we observed that the epiblast epithelium outside of the streak was ~1.4-fold thicker than in wild-type embryos (Fig. 7A, E). Individual cells of the anterior Crumbs2 epiblast (the future neural epithelium) were taller and had smaller apical surfaces than those in wild type (Fig. 7B, D). This was not due to altered proliferation rates, as the frequency of mitotic cells was the same in the wild type and mutants (Supplementary Fig. 7A); nor was it due to a breakdown in apical-basal polarity, as apical markers were localized correctly in the mutants (Supplementary Fig. 7B). Breaks in the basement membrane were detected in the mutant neural epithelium (Fig. 7A) and occasional cells expressing SOX2 were detected below the breaks in the basement membrane (Fig. 7A), demonstrating that integrity of the epiblast was compromised in the mutants at this stage.

Figure 7. CRB2 is required for epiblast integrity at the primitive streak only when cells delaminate at the streak.

Figure 7

(A) Single optical sections of transverse section through the anterior epiblast/presumptive neural epithelium of wild-type and Crumbs2 mutants immunostained for SOX2 and Laminin show the increased thickness of the neural epithelium in the mutants at E8.0. (B) En face views of the surface of the anterior epiblast of wild type and Crumbs2 stained with ZO1 show the reduction in the apical surface area of the cells in the Crumbs2 mutants. (C) 3D reconstruction of cells in the neural epithelium of wild type and Crumbs2−/− embryos expressing X-linked GFP and stained for ZO1. The cells in the mutants have reduced apical surface area and an increased basolateral domain; ZO1 is expressed in the correct apical domain. (D) Quantification of apical cell surface area of cells in the wild-type and Crumbs2 mutant anterior epiblast/presumptive neural epithelium (mean ± SEM), WT = 23.64±0.60, n=559 cells, 4 embryos and Crumbs2−/− = 10.50±0.34, n=471 cells, 5 embryos, p<0.0001. (E) Quantification of neural epithelial thickness (mean ± SEM), WT = 37.75±0.92, n=15 anterior epiblast and Crumbs2−/−=53.25±1.60, n=14 anterior epiblast, p<0.0001. (F) Wnt3−/− and Crumbs2−/− Wnt3−/− double mutant embryos are morphologically identical. Wnt3−/− mutants do not form a primitive streak and develop as a bag of epithelial cells (n=8 double mutant embryos). (G) Transverse section through the embryos immunostained for Laminin (green) and SOX2 (red), n=5 double mutant embryos. (H) Higher magnification of the epithelium of Wnt3−/− and Wnt3−/− Crumbs2−/−embryos shows that the double mutants do not have breaks in laminin expression or SOX2 positive nuclei below the basement membrane. Scale bars A–C, G–H, 21 μm; F,150 μm. The images shown here are representative and show the mutant and wild type from the same experiment.

To test whether CRB2 was required for integrity of the epiblast in older embryos because of events triggered by gastrulation, we blocked primitive streak formation genetically. Wnt3 is required for the initiation of the primitive streak, but the Wnt3 mutant epiblast continues to proliferate as an epithelium25. Crumbs2 Wnt3 double mutants were indistinguishable in morphology from Wnt3 single mutants (Fig. 7F). Sections stained for SOX2 and Laminin expression showed that the double mutant epiblast resembled that of the Wnt3 single mutants (Fig. 7G, H): the basement membrane below the epiblast appeared to be intact (Fig. 7H) and no SOX2-positive nuclei were located below the basement membrane in the double mutants (Fig. 7H). We infer that the defects in epithelial organization of the Crumbs2 epiblast are secondary to the gastrulation phenotype, which suggests that that the physical disruption caused by the absence of CRB2 at the primitive streak propagates through the contiguous epiblast epithelium.

DISCUSSION

The data presented here define a specific role for the apical protein CRB2 in promoting cell ingression during the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition that generates the germ layers during mouse gastrulation. A previous analysis of the mouse Crumbs2 mutant phenotype identified a defect in gastrulation14; that group inferred, based on the function of Drosophila Crumbs, that the gastrulation defect was secondary to disruption of apical-basal polarity in the epiblast. In contrast, we find that mouse embryos that lack all Crumbs proteins form an epiblast epithelium that expresses classical markers of apical-basal polarity in the correct pattern. The phenotype of the Crumbs2 null mutant is recapitulated by deleting the gene specifically in cells of the primitive streak using T-Cre, demonstrating that CRB2 is specifically required in the cells of the primitive streak to promote the EMT.

Crumbs2 mutants show a striking block in cell ingression beginning at E7.5. The first steps of the EMT are successful in Crumbs2 mutants: the basement membrane breaks down, and cells at the streak undergo apical constriction accompanied by a basal shift of the cell body. However, in the absence of CRB2, apical junctions do not dissolve, even as the cell body moves further away from the apical surface, leaving a long thin E-cadherin+ cytoplasmic connection to the apical surface of the epiblast.

The cells that accumulate at the streak in Crumbs2 mutants express SOX2 rather than SNAIL1, suggesting that the expression of SNAIL1 depends on completion of the CRB2-dependent step in cell ingression. As SNAIL1 represses expression of both SOX2 and E-cadherin during the EMT 9,26,27, the absence of SNAIL1 could also account for the failure to down-regulate E-cadherin in Crumbs2 mutants. However, mouse embryos that lack SNAIL1 protein do make a mesoderm layer27, indicating the failure to upregulate SNAIL1 is not sufficient to block cell ingression. We therefore infer that CRB2 has an additional role during the EMT.

CRB2 is localized in a striking anisotropic pattern in the apical epiblast. The accumulation of unequal levels of CRB2 on different cell edges is reminiscent of the distribution of planar cell polarity proteins, but there is no obvious polarity of the CRB2 distribution, suggesting that it is not dictated by a global clue. In chimeric embryos, wild-type epiblast cells adjacent to mutant cells lacked detectable CRB2 protein on the interface with the mutant cell (Fig. 4F and Supplementary Fig 4C), suggesting that stability of CRB2 depends on the formation of homophilic complexes with CRB2 on adjacent cells, as in Drosophila and zebrafish20,21,22. These data suggest that the complex CRB2 distribution in the apical epiblast is self-organizing: once a cell expresses high CRB2 on a cell edge adjacent to a CRB2-expressing cell, a positive feedback loop leads to accumulation of more CRB2 at that edge.

Although Myosin IIB is present at all cell edges of the mouse epiblast, the level of Myosin IIB is inversely correlated with the amount of CRB2 on that edge. In the invaginating Drosophila salivary gland placode, homophilic interactions between Crumbs proteins on adjacent cell edges recruit aPKC20,28. aPKC can phosphorylate and inactivate Rho-kinase, and Rho-kinase can activate myosin assembly29. Thus we hypothesize that aPKC is sequestered to cell edges with high CRB2, promoting myosin assembly on cell edges with low CRB2. Myosin cables under tension will recruit more myosin in a Rho-kinase dependent process30; such a positive feedback loop could reinforce the anisotropy of the myosin distribution in the mouse epiblast (Fig. 6F).

We suggest that the unequal distribution of CRB2 protein is an essential component of a local mechanism that determines which cells will ingress from the epithelium. As high levels of CRB2 correlate with lower levels of Myosin IIB, the final stage of cell ingression during the EMT may occur by basal cell extrusion, where myosin contraction in cells neighboring a high CRB2-expressing cell pushes the adjacent CRB2+ cell out of the epithelium. This process may resemble apical cell extrusion, which removes dying cells from epithelia31 and the basal cell extrusion that takes place during metastasis32. Generation of new transgenic reporters for live imaging of the dynamics of Myosin IIB and CRB2 should help define the events and mechanisms of cell ingression during this EMT.

Our findings fit with a recent model that ingression of cells at the primitive streak is a population event controlled by dynamic, self-reinforcing cell interactions4, and place the CRB2 protein complex at a central node in these interactions. In this view, CRB2 anisotropy helps determine which cells will ingress at the streak while promoting the mechanical process of ingression. In addition, forces generated at the streak in the absence of CRB2 affect the integrity of the contiguous epithelium of the epiblast, consistent with a role for Crumbs proteins in global tissue integrity during dynamic tissue rearrangements11,33.

Heritable mutations in CRB2 have been identified in childhood-onset kidney disease 34,35, and abnormal epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions are associated with renal fibrosis36,37. EMTs have been implicated in tumor progression, and both amplification and point mutations in CRB2 have been identified in large-scale cancer genome sequencing projects38,39,40,41. Cell biological studies to test the functional significance of these CRB2 mutations should provide new perspectives on tissue dynamics in human disease and cancer progression.

Supplementary Material

Methods
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
Supp. legends

Acknowledgments

We thank the MSKCC Molecular Cytology and Mouse Genetics Core Facilities for valuable technical support. We thank the Hadjantonakis lab for the X-linked GFP and GFP-GPI strains. We thank Mark Lewandoski for Brachyury-Cre mice. We thank Jennifer Zallen, Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis, Alan Hall, Isabelle Migeotte, Hemant Kakkar and members of the Anderson lab for their helpful suggestions. The work was supported by NIH R37 HD03455 to KVA and the MSKCC Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748).

Footnotes

Author Contributions

NR carried out the experiments, TO participated in and analyzed the live imaging experiments. NFS-G, CJM and JW provided essential reagents and advice. NR and KVA designed experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

References

  • 1.Shook D, Keller R. Mechanisms, mechanics and function of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in early development. Mech Dev. 2003;120:1351–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2003.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. EMT: 2016 . Cell. 2016;166:21–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Williams M, Burdsal C, Periasamy A, Lewandoski M, Sutherland A. Mouse primitive streak forms in situ by initiation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition without migration of a cell population. Dev Dyn. 2012;241:270–283. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Voiculescu O, Bodenstein L, Lau IJ, Stern CD. Local cell interactions and self-amplifying individual cell ingression drive amniote gastrulation. eLife. 2014;3:e01817. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Herion NJ, Salbaum JM, Kappen C. Traffic jam in the primitive streak: the role of defective mesoderm migration in birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014;100:608–622. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139:871–890. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scheel C, Weinberg RA. Cancer stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition: concepts and molecular links. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012;22:396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arnold SJ, Robertson EJ. Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:91–103. doi: 10.1038/nrm2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Acloque H, et al. Reciprocal repression between Sox3 and snail transcription factors defines embryonic territories at gastrulation. Dev Cell. 2011;21:546–558. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tepass U, Theres C, Knust E. Crumbs encodes an EGF-like protein expressed on apical membranes of Drosophila epithelial cells and required for organization of epithelia. Cell. 1990;61:787–799. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90189-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tepass U. Crumbs, a component of the apical membrane, is required for zonula adherens formation in primary epithelia of Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1996;177:217–225. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van de Pavert SA, et al. Crumbs homologue 1 is required for maintenance of photoreceptor cell polarization and adhesion during light exposure. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:4169–4177. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whiteman EL, et al. Crumbs3 is essential for proper epithelial development and viability. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:43–56. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00999-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiao Z, et al. Deficiency in Crumbs homolog 2 (Crb2) affects gastrulation and results in embryonic lethality in mice. Dev Dyn. 2011;240:2646–2656. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ramkumar N, et al. Protein O-Glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1) promotes mouse gastrulation through modification of the apical polarity protein CRUMBS2. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hadjantonakis AK, Cox LL, Tam PP, Nagy A. An X-linked GFP transgene reveals unexpected paternal X-chromosome activity in trophoblastic giant cells of the mouse placenta. Genesis. 2001;29:133–140. doi: 10.1002/gene.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hayashi S, Lewis P, Pevny L, McMahon AP. Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain. Mech Dev. 2002;119(Suppl 1):S97–S101. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(03)00099-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Perantoni AO, et al. Inactivation of FGF8 in early mesoderm reveals an essential role in kidney development. Development. 2005;132:3859–3871. doi: 10.1242/dev.01945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rhee JM, et al. In vivo imaging and differential localization of lipid-modified GFP-variant fusions in embryonic stem cells and mice. Genesis. 2006;44:202–218. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Röper K. Anisotropy of Crumbs and aPKC drives myosin cable assembly during tube formation. Dev Cell. 2012;23:939–953. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Letizia A, Ricardo S, Moussian B, Martín N, Llimargasm M. A functional role of the extracellular domain of Crumbs in cell architecture and apicobasal polarity. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:2157–2163. doi: 10.1242/jcs.122382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zou J, Wang X, Wei X. Crb apical polarity proteins maintain zebrafish retinal cone mosaics via intercellular binding of their extracellular domains. Dev Cell. 2012;22:1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tepass U. The apical polarity protein network in Drosophila epithelial cells: regulation of polarity, junctions, morphogenesis, cell growth, and survival. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:655–685. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rozbicki E, et al. Myosin-II-mediated cell shape changes and cell intercalation contribute to primitive streak formation. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:397–408. doi: 10.1038/ncb3138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu P, et al. Requirement for Wnt3 in vertebrate axis formation. Nat Genet. 1999;22:361–365. doi: 10.1038/11932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ciruna B, Rossant J. FGF signaling regulates mesoderm cell fate specification and morphogenetic movement at the primitive streak. Dev Cell. 2001;1:37–49. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carver EA, Jiang R, Lan Y, Oram KF, Gridley T. The mouse snail gene encodes a key regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:8184–8188. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.23.8184-8188.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fletcher GC, Lucas EP, Brain R, Tournier A, Thompson BJ. Positive feedback and mutual antagonism combine to polarize Crumbs in the Drosophila follicle cell epithelium. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1116–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ishiuchi T, Takeichi M. Willin and Par3 cooperatively regulate epithelial apical constriction through aPKC-mediated ROCK phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:860–866. doi: 10.1038/ncb2274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fernandez-Gonzalez R, de Simoes SM, Röper JC, Eaton S, Zallen JA. Myosin II dynamics are regulated by tension in intercalating cells. Dev Cell. 2009;17:736–743. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Slattum G, McGee KM, Rosenblatt J. P115 RhoGEF and microtubules decide the direction apoptotic cells extrude from an epithelium. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:693–702. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200903079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Slattum GM, Rosenblatt J. Tumour cell invasion: an emerging role for basal epithelial cell extrusion. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nrc3767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Campbell K, Knust E, Skaer H. Crumbs stabilises epithelial polarity during tissue remodelling. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:2604–2612. doi: 10.1242/jcs.047183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ebarasi L, et al. Defects of CRB2 cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Slavotinek A, et al. CRB2 mutations produce a phenotype resembling congenital nephrosis, Finnish type, with cerebral ventriculomegaly and raised alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grande MT, et al. Snail1-induced partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives renal fibrosis in mice and can be targeted to reverse established disease. Nat Med. 2015;21:989–997. doi: 10.1038/nm.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lovisa S, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition induces cell cycle arrest and parenchymal damage in renal fibrosis. Nat Med. 2015;21:998–1009. doi: 10.1038/nm.3902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arcila ME, et al. MAP2K1 (MEK1) Mutations Define a Distinct Subset of Lung Adenocarcinoma Associated with Smoking. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1935–1943. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Beltran H, et al. Divergent clonal evolution of castration-resistant neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat Med. 2016;22:298–305. doi: 10.1038/nm.4045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cerami E, et al. The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal: An Open Platform for Exploring Multidimensional Cancer Genomics Data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–404. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gao J, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:p11. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alves CH, et al. Loss of CRB2 in the mouse retina mimics human retinitis pigmentosa due to mutations in the CRB1 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:35–50. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Barrow JR, et al. Ectodermal Wnt3/beta-catenin signaling is required for the establishment and maintenance of the apical ectodermal ridge. Genes Dev. 2003;17:394–409. doi: 10.1101/gad.1044903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mehalow AK, et al. CRB1 is essential for external limiting membrane integrity and photoreceptor morphogenesis in the mammalian retina. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:2179–2189. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis. 2007;45:593–605. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lakso M, et al. Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:5860–5865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee JD, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Tepass U, McGlade CJ, Anderson KV. The FERM protein Epb4.1l5 is required for organization of the neural plate and for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition at the primitive streak of the mouse embryo. Development. 2007;134:2007–2016. doi: 10.1242/dev.000885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Laprise P, et al. The FERM protein Yurt is a negative regulatory component of the Crumbs complex that controls epithelial polarity and apical membrane size. Dev Cell. 2006;11:363–374. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Franci C, et al. Expression of Snail protein in tumor-stroma interface. Oncogene. 2006;25:5134–5144. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lemmers C, Médina E, Delgrossi MH, Michel D, Arsanto JP, Le Bivic A. hINADl/PATJ, a homolog of discs lost, interacts with crumbs and localizes to tight junctions in human epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:25408–25415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202196200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Caspary T, Larkins CE, Anderson KV. The graded response to Sonic Hedgehog depends on cilia architecture. Dev Cell. 2007;12:767–778. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Migeotte I, Grego-Bessa J, Anderson KV. Rac1 mediates morphogenetic responses to intercellular signals in the gastrulating mouse embryo. Development. 2011;138:3011–3020. doi: 10.1242/dev.059766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Silva J, et al. Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li Z, Wang L, Hays TS, Cai Y. Dynein-mediated apical localization of crumbs transcripts is required for Crumbs activity in epithelial polarity. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:31–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200707007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Methods
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
Supp. legends

RESOURCES