Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;145:116–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.005

Table A1.

Description of sample: Panel construction.


(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Number of villages Reasons for reduction in panel size
Year 2003 Year 2010 Panel Reduction in More than 8 panel Village population Village population Village not found Other reasons
panel size villages in district less than 250 more than 10,000 in Census 2001
Andhra Pradesh 81 87 73 8 3 0 4 1 0
Assam 98 87 77 21 5 3 0 10 3
Bihar 94 84 84 10 10 0 0 0 0
Chattisgarh 85 80 76 9 1 0 1 2 5
Gujarat 82 88 74 8 2 2 2 0 2
Haryana 81 81 75 6 3 1 1 1 0
Himachal Pradesh 89 80 60 29 2 22 0 4 1
Jharkhand 87 84 73 14 7 4 0 1 2
Karnataka 91 89 84 7 2 3 2 0 0
Kerala 83 83 43 40 0 0 40 0 0
Madhya Pradesh 88 90 81 7 3 1 2 1 0
Maharastra 85 91 80 5 2 0 3 0 0
Orissa 92 87 79 13 4 5 1 3 0
Punjab 78 82 75 3 0 0 1 2 0
Rajasthan 91 98 85 6 1 1 0 4 0
Tamilnadu 84 87 69 15 5 0 6 4 0
Uttar Pradesh 114 113 104 10 9 1 0 0 0
Uttaranchal 80 72 57 23 6 14 1 2 0
West Bengal 85 87 70 15 4 3 5 1 2
India 1,668 1,650 1,419 249 69 60 69 36 15

Source: Authors' calculations. Notes: The upper population cutoff for all states was 10,000 as per the 1991 census, except Kerala where the cutoff was 20,000. The category others include: replaced because high Naxalite activity (6 villages), replaced because duplicate in 2003 sample (2 villages), replaced because district was replaced (2 villages) replaced because village too remote (1 village), replaced because name missing in 2003 list (1 village), replaced because of floods in village (2 village), replaced because village could not be located (1 village).