Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;145:116–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.005

Table A8.

Marginal returns to investing in governance.


(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Student-teacher ratio (2009–2010) Effect of increasing probability of inspection in past 3 months by 10 percentage points Cost to produce equal effect through teacher hiring
Student-teacher ratio Effective student-teacher ratio Annual cost (Rs. millions) Annual savings from reduced teacher absence (Rs. millions) Expected effective student-teacher ratio Annual cost (Rs. millions)
Andhra Pradesh 17.8 22.7 31.0 350.8 22.5 433.5
Assam 24.5 33.2 15.9 154.5 33.0 204.2
Bihar 58.2 81.6 21.2 273.6 80.8 374.9
Chattisgarh 24.5 28.5 13.9 120.1 28.3 135.0
Gujarat 29.8 35.5 19.1 291.8 35.3 336.2
Haryana 26.8 32.5 8.8 118.9 32.3 139.8
Himachal Pradesh 15.4 22.2 6.8 56.0 22.0 79.2
Jharkhand 41.3 76.2 14.8 127.9 75.3 236.3
Karnataka 23.6 31.0 18.5 201.6 30.8 257.7
Kerala 19.6 23.2 2.0 56.3 23.1 64.5
Madhya Pradesh 39.8 54.0 40.6 250.9 53.5 332.1
Maharastra 25.7 29.9 45.0 486.8 29.7 546.8
Orissa 29.4 34.3 20.5 177.5 34.1 199.7
Punjab 20.5 23.7 10.2 137.4 23.5 153.2
Rajasthan 26.2 33.9 40.0 361.6 33.6 454.5
Tamilnadu 28.3 32.5 24.6 264.9 32.3 293.2
Uttar Pradesh 40.1 58.2 58.4 489.4 57.7 697.1
Uttaranchal 20.6 26.0 10.7 73.3 25.8 90.0
West Bengal 32.3 40.8 30.1 409.4 40.5 502.5
India 31.7 41.5 448.0 4509.6 41.1 5742.0

Source: Authors' calculations; DISE. Notes: Number of schools, number of teachers, and enrollment figures are from administrative (DISE) data. Simulation assumes that one inspection every 3 months reduces absence linearly by 6.4 percentage points. Inspector costs are assumed to be two times teacher salaries, travel costs are assumed to be 80% of monthly salary, and an inspector is assumed to work 200 days a year and inspect two schools every day.