Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;66:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.007

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics improved chickpea adoption.

2006/07
2009/10
2013/14
Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d.
Panel A: Balanced sample
Chickpea (yes = 1) 0.655 0.476 0.805 0.396 0.881 0.324
Improved variety (1 = yes) 0.312 0.464 0.630 0.483 0.790 0.407
Improved chickpea area (ha) 0.172 0.390 0.327 0.414 0.425 0.427
Improved chickpea seed (kg) 34.23 79.27 60.70 80.05 89.60 101.8
Improved chickpea share area (%) 5.925 11.67 12.11 12.96 18.90 14.24
Improved chickpea share income (%) 7.023 13.80 15.84 16.94 16.23 13.21



Observations 606 606 606



Panel B: Chickpea growers
Improved variety (1 = yes) 0.476 0.500 0.783 0.413 0.897 0.304
Improved chickpea area (ha) 0.263 0.457 0.406 0.425 0.482 0.423
Improved chickpea seed (kg) 52.25 93.04 75.38 82.78 101.7 102.7
Improved chickpea share area (%) 9.044 13.41 15.03 12.82 21.45 13.24
Improved chickpea share income (%) 10.72 15.85 19.68 16.77 18.42 12.56



Observations 397 488 534

Note: Panel A displays means and standard deviations of improved chickpea adoption indicators by year for the balanced sample. Panel B displays means and standard deviations of improved chickpea adoption indicators by year for households that grow chickpeas.