Table 1. Descriptive statistics according to condition.
Inoculation (n = 102) | Control (n = 128) | Between-condition effect size (d) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | ||
Inoculation components | |||||
Threat | 4.40 | 1.38 | 4.53 | 1.18 | .10 |
Task importance | 6.40 | .75 | 6.04 | .83 | .46 |
Pre-task perceptions | |||||
Social anxiety | 2.95 | .93 | 3.21 | .94 | .28 |
Task-related anxiety | 3.36 | .88 | 3.74 | .87 | .43 |
Self-efficacy | 3.01 | .66 | 2.89 | .67 | .18 |
Task perceptions | |||||
Cognitive anxiety/Worry | 2.32 | .75 | 2.56 | .76 | .32 |
Somatic anxiety | 1.90 | .70 | 2.18 | .78 | .38 |
Interpretation of anxiety | -.37 | 1.18 | -.73 | 1.03 | .32 |
Impact of message | .52 | .97 | -.02 | .84 | .60 |
Negative self-talk | .97 | .82 | 1.23 | .93 | .30 |
Note. Threat and importance measured 1–7, where higher scores denote greater threat/importance. Social anxiety, task-related anxiety, and self-efficacy measured 1–5, where higher scores denote greater anxiety/confidence. Cognitive and somatic anxiety rated 1–4, where higher scores denote greater anxiety. Interpretation of anxiety and impact of message rated -3 to 3, where positive (negative) scores denoted a more positive (negative) interpretation of anxiety/impact of message. Negative self-talk measured 0–5, where higher scores denote greater negative self-talk. d column = Cohen’s d effect size estimate for mean between-condition comparison on each primary variable.