Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mov Disord. 2016 Oct 6;32(1):115–123. doi: 10.1002/mds.26815

Table 1. Association of common LRRK2 variants with risk of PSP and CBD.

PSP patients vs. controls CBD patients vs. controls

Variant Amino
Acid
MAa MAFb in
controls
(N=1790)
MAFb in PSP
(N=996)
ORc
(95% CId)
P-value MAFb in
CBD (N=134)
ORc
(95% CId)
P-value
rs10878245 L153L T 38.2% 41.4% 1.22 (1.04, 1.44) 0.014 41.4% 1.42 (0.97, 2.08) 0.065
rs7308720 N551K G 7.6% 7.1% 0.92 (0.73, 1.15) 0.44 8.6% 1.06 (0.65, 1.73) 0.81
rs10878307 I723V G 7.7% 7.3% 0.93 (0.74, 1.16) 0.51 9.0% 1.13 (0.69, 1.85) 0.62
rs7966550 L953L C 12.6% 12.7% 1.04 (0.86, 1.24) 0.72 13.4% 1.28 (0.85, 1.91) 0.24
rs7133914 R1398H A 7.4% 7.1% 0.94 (0.75, 1.18) 0.60 8.6% 1.09 (0.67, 1.77) 0.74
rs11175964 K1423K A 7.3% 7.1% 0.97 (0.77, 1.21) 0.76 8.2% 1.06 (0.64, 1.74) 0.83
rs35507033 R1514Q A 0.8% 0.5% 0.59 (0.28, 1.26) 0.17 0.7% 0.99 (0.23, 4.29) 0.98
rs33958906 P1542S T 2.8% 2.9% 1.03 (0.73, 1.44) 0.88 1.9% 0.62 (0.25, 1.57) 0.31
rs1427263 G1624G C 35.1% 34.3% 1.00 (0.86, 1.17) 0.98 35.8% 1.13 (0.79, 1.63) 0.50
rs11176013 K1637K A 45.1% 45.2% 1.07 (0.90, 1.26) 0.46 45.5% 1.08 (0.73, 1.59) 0.70
rs35303786 M1646T C 1.3% 1.4% 1.03 (0.63, 1.68) 0.90 1.5% 1.12 (0.39, 3.19) 0.84
rs11564148 S1647T A 30.4% 31.0% 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) 0.79 30.6% 0.98 (0.69, 1.40) 0.92
rs10878371 G1819G T 45.1% 44.5% 1.01 (0.86, 1.20) 0.87 44.8% 1.01 (0.69, 1.48) 0.97
rs33995883 N2081D G 1.9% 2.3% 1.24 (0.84, 1.82) 0.29 2.6% 1.51 (0.67, 3.39) 0.32
rs10878405 E2108E A 31.0% 31.4% 1.02 (0.88, 1.20) 0.77 31.7% 1.16 (0.82, 1.66) 0.40
rs33962975 G2385G G 14.1% 14.4% 1.01 (0.85, 1.21) 0.90 13.1% 0.86 (0.57, 1.31) 0.48
rs3761863 M2397T T 34.5% 34.1% 1.04 (0.89, 1.21) 0.66 35.4% 1.20 (0.84, 1.72) 0.32
rs76904798 N/A T 14.0% 14.8% 1.04 (0.87, 1.24) 0.69 10.5% 0.70 (0.45, 1.08) 0.10
a

MA=minor allele;

b

MAF=minor allele frequency;

c

OR=odds ratio;

d

CI=confidence interval. ORs, 95% CIs, and p-values result from logistic regression models adjusted for age (age at death in PSP/CBD patients, age at last follow-up in controls) and gender.

LRRK2 variants were examined under a dominant model; ORs correspond to presence of the minor allele. After applying a single-step minP permutation adjustment for multiple testing, p-values ≤ 0.0036 (PSP vs. controls) and ≤ 0.0038 (CBD vs. controls) were considered as statistically significant.