Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;292(4):1490–1509. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.758185

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 with or without UO126 treatment on nuclear localization of endogenous VDR and RXRα in HPK1A and HPK1ARas cells. HPK1A cells were grown and treated with either vehicle (Veh) or 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3). The cells were also fixed and stained with VDR-Alexa-488 (A) or RXRα-Alexa-488 (C) antibodies to detect VDR or RXRα. Alexa-488 (C) followed by treatment with either vehicle (veh) or 1,25(OH)2D3. Hoechst dye was used as a DNA marker as discussed under “Experimental Procedures.” Similarly, HPK1ARas cells were grown and treated with either vehicle or 1,25(OH)2D3. The cells were then fixed and stained with VDR-Alexa-488 (E) or RXRα-Alexa-488 (G) antibodies to detect VDR or RXRα. Hoechst dye was also used as a DNA marker as discussed under “Experimental Procedures.” Nuclear localization was assessed as under “Experimental Procedures.” Scatter plots show the quantitation of fluorescence of nuclear receptors normalized to total cell fluorescence (B, D, F, and H). Values represent mean ± S.D. of at least 10 different cells. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in nuclear localization between 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment alone compared with vehicle-treated control. Open circles indicate a significant difference in nuclear localization of receptors in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated cells alone compared with combined UO126 and 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment. A p value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.