Table 2.
Comparison of NetworkBLAST-M and Graemlin 1.0 on nine microbial networks in terms of specificity and sensitivity
| Specificity (%) | Sensitivity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | NetworkBLAST-M | Graemlin 1.0 | NetworkBLAST-M | Graemlin 1.0 |
| S. coelicolor | 100.0 | 71.4 | 17 | 12 |
| E. coli E12 | 90.0 | 76.5 | 16 | 10 |
| M. tuberculosis | 87.9 | 76.9 | 17 | 8 |
| S. typhimurium | 93.1 | 81.3 | 14 | 10 |
| C. crescentus | 84.8 | 86.7 | 15 | 11 |
| V. cholerae | 90.6 | 80.0 | 16 | 9 |
| S. pneumoniae | 97.0 | 71.4 | 14 | 8 |
| C. jejuni | 96.2 | 76.9 | 12 | 9 |
| H. pylori | 92.3 | 56.3 | 13 | 8 |
For a given measure, the superior of the two methods is indicated in bold. The table is adopted from [94]