Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Feb;49(2):274–282. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001109

Table 3. Prospective1 association of continuous average healthy lifestyle score2 with physical performance measures, adjusted for confounders.

Minimally Adjusted Model3 Final Model4
Outcome Beta (95% CI) p value Beta (95% CI) p value
4 M Walk (sec) -0.06 (-0.1, -0.03) 0.0005 -0.06 (-0.1, -0.02) 0.001
Grip strength (kg) 0.14 (-0.09, 0.37) 0.23 0.14 (-0.09, 0.37) 0.24
Chair stand (sec) -0.21 (-0.34, -0.08) 0.002 -0.18 (-0.31, -0.05) 0.008
Decile Score 0.44 (0.22, 0.65) <0.0001 0.35 (0.13, 0.57) 0.002
Odds Ratio (95% CI) p value Odds Ratio (95% CI) p value
No balance problem (vs. some) 0.906 (0.78, 1.06) 0.20 0.88 (0.76, 1.04) 0.13
1

Healthy lifestyle score measured at least 4 years prior to physical performance measures

2

Possible range of healthy lifestyle score=1-6

3

Adjusted for age, race, site, BMI, overall self-rated health and number of visits with HLS

4

All models adjusted for age, race, site, BMI, overall self-rated health, and arthritis; 4 m walk additionally adjusted for number of comorbidities and foot covering; 40 ft walk additionally adjusted for marital status, diabetes, arthritis, type of menopause, floor surface and alcohol use; grip strength additionally adjusted for difficulty paying for basics, alcohol use, dominant hand and dynamometer setting; chair stand additionally adjusted for number of comorbidities, difficulty paying for basics, foot covering; decile score additionally adjusted for number of comorbidities, difficulty paying for basics, education, alcohol use, and arthritis; balance additionally adjusted for CES-D, foot covering, hormone use and alcohol use